Wikipedia:Peer review/Carbon Canyon Regional Park/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to someday take this article to GA status and I want to see what can be done to further improve the quality of the content included in this article.
Thanks, MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 04:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Comments
- The details given are very brief. Are there no sources for a fuller description? This applies especially to the section on the redwoods. Is there no information available on other aspects of the ecology?
- The section on history is one that could be expanded using the source given. The reference should be at the end of the paragraph rather after the word "flooding" to show that the source supports the whole paragraph not just the text up to the citation.
- A section on access would be helpful. What roads are the entrances on?
- Many sentences are unreferenced. All should be. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Dudley Miles: By "Many sentences are unreferenced. All should be," do you mean literally each one should have a
<ref>tag associated with it or just a ref tag near it (like at the end of a paragraph if it encompasses all the details in the paragraph? -- MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 05:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Dudley Miles: By "Many sentences are unreferenced. All should be," do you mean literally each one should have a
- Sorry I was misleading. I should have said that all need referencing, but not separate refs if several sentences have the same source. There should be at least one ref at the end of each paragraph. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)