Wikipedia:Peer review/Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare/archive1
Appearance
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking for critical reviews for it so that it can be put through WP:FAC in the near future.
Thanks, Gary King (talk) 05:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)
- What makes the following reliable sources?
https://gaming-soft.com/cod-2024//- Removed Gary King (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- http://www.gametrailers.com/index.php
- It's similar to GameSpot, and has its own editorial team. Gary King (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hm. Any reason you need to go with them over the others? I'm just looking at it in regards to the RS guidelines, and they aren't exactly up there in the same tier with the published game mags and IGN/GameSpot type sites. Borderline RS, in my mind, but it'd be one of those I'd leave out for others to decide on, rather than feeling sure they are 100% RS. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's similar to GameSpot, and has its own editorial team. Gary King (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
http://www.tomsgames.com/us/- replaced with IGN Gary King (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- http://kotaku.com/. The wiki article says its a blog.
Current ref 8 Call of Duty at Steam, the Steam link leads to the chemical property. You need to disambig it.- fixed Gary King (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a little leery of the joystiq trailer refs. Don't ask me why, it's mostly a gut feeling that something is off with them. I don't see joystiq being the publisher, that would be the game developer, right?
- replaced with gametrailers Gary King (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Looks like the publisher of https://gaming-soft.com/cod-2024/ should really be IGN, right?
I didn't do a What will CoD 2024 be? Best Call of Duty 2024 Leaked Concept
check, so bear that in mind. 18:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)