Wikipedia:Peer review/Bruce Chatwin/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am interested in nominating it for Featured Article status and would like feedback on improving the article before nominating it.
Thanks, Notachatterbox (talk) 23:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay Notachatterbox. I only managed to get two FAs so far but I managed to get some knowledge that might help you before nominating this article.
- First of all, avoid small paragraphs like Themes' first one. Merge them with others or try to expand them.
- All the references need wikilinks. See for example my recent FA, Tidus, that has links in all of its references regardless of repeating sites.
- Avoid redlinks.
Other than that, I can't find more notable issues. I also have my own current peer review, Wikipedia:Peer review/D.Gray-man/archive1, so I wonder if you could provide commentary there. Good luck with the article.Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! I appreciate it your comments - they're helpful! Notachatterbox (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)