Wikipedia:Peer review/Brock University Students' Union/archive1
Most of the users that have made edits to the Brock University Students' Union article to date have been either anonymous users that are members of the organization itself, unestablished Wikipedia users that are members of the organization, and myself, also a high-enough up member in the students' union in order for me to feel too close to the article at times.
Currently, this has led to a very "inclusionist" attitude toward article content. However, I think it is time to ask the question, "what information is appropriate for a students' union article, and what information is inappropriate for the article and should be removed?", especially as I think the article might be getting too unwieldy.
What do other Wikipedians think? Andy Saunders 06:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is my first peer review. You should feel lucky!
- The article certainly is detailed, so kudos on that. The only major problem I saw was a rampant use of ampersands, a real no-no in standard English. There were also a couple of misspellings. I corrected these on my own.
- As an eighteen-year-old high school student from the U.S., I certainly was not very personally close to the article. Heh. I hope I have been helpful. Chris 04:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, Chris! Andy Saunders 04:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 23:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)