Wikipedia:Peer review/Banana Fish/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
.
When I expanded this article a few months ago I didn't do so with the intent of one day taking it to FAC (I'm very happy with my current rate of one FAC per year), but upon reflection the article is of comparable length and scope to the previous manga articles I've taken to FAC (The Heart of Thomas and Kaze to Ki no Uta), so I'd like to submit it here as a float test for FAC, and to identify any gaps or deficiencies in the article. Morgan695 (talk) 16:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments from Tintor2
[edit]Some small tidbits that FA reviewers tend to point:
- Context is kinda strange. I know Banana Fish is a shojo manga but the series and author are not mentioned until the second paragraph.
- You'll recall this came up in the GAR as well; my rationale was that a major component of Banana Fish's notability is how it represented a break from established shōjo manga conventions of the era, so I believe the article needs to devote some space to establishing what those conventions are. Do you have any suggestions for how the section can read better? Morgan695 (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't the manga use chapter titles for the list of volumes?
- In this case, maybe creating an article for the volumes and summaries might work.
- The manga does not use chapter titles; or at least, the English edition does not. Morgan695 (talk) 06:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- In this case, maybe creating an article for the volumes and summaries might work.
- References like "Yoshida, Akimi (November 13, 2002). Banana Fish, Vol. 7. ISBN 1569318433." might need a better replacements
- Done. Morgan695 (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I see that User:Citation bot has swapped the new Amazon citation for the previous format, so I suppose this is the preferred cite style? I guess we'll wait and see if this comes up in the FAC. Morgan695 (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Remember to add transtitle to every Japanese references.
- Done. Morgan695 (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Archive the further reading Manga Bookshelf article. Tintor2 (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done. Morgan695 (talk) 06:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: Hi, reply above. Morgan695 (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Aoba47
[edit]Addressed comments
|
---|
I hope these comments are helpful. Once everything is addressed, I will do a more thorough read-through of the article. If you have time, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my current FAC which is about a series that has far, far less impact and has fallen into complete and utter obscurity. Best of luck with the peer review! Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
|
I read through the article a few times and I could not find anything further to discuss here. I will be more than happy to help with the FAC in the future. Best of luck with it! Aoba47 (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)