Wikipedia:Peer review/Backlash (2004)/archive1

Backlash (2004)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I would like for the article to be a professional wrestling Good Article. Any helpful feedback, would most be appreciated.

Thanks, Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 19:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 03:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

Hello Zenlax, some comments which you may find useful.

Is it Backlash (2004) or Backlash 2004? Infobox has latter, title and lead has former. Or Backlash, as in the main article?
- We do this because of the comments left on No Way Out (2004)'s last FAC. –L A X 19:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not a good answer. Can you explain why you do this beside saying that it was because someone suggested it? What is the title? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - I changed the infobox to match the article title and lead. Sometimes it takes less effort to just change something in an article than to go about defending it. Nikki311 19:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First three paras of Event could be merged.
"enziguiri kick" what's that?
You use [29][30] for five consecutive sentences. It'd be better to just use it once at the end of the fifth sentence. There are several examples of this.

done Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 20:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Numbers in parentheses indicate the length of the match." why in small font?
- We do this because of the comments left on No Way Out (2004)'s last FAC. –L A X 19:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well don't. What's the point? Small fonts just make it difficult for those with visualisation problems. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Would you like this to be changed? Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - No longer small. Once again, not a big deal to change. Nikki311 19:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is " Running Enzuigiri" capitalised?
- The results stated here have it capitalized. I, however have removed "Running" from the finisher and left it with an Enzuigiri. Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 20:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - This may sound blunt but I don't really care what other articles have these problems, I want to know why nouns which aren't proper nouns are capitalised? If there's a reason then fine, otherwise it's just incorrect. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's fair. Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise I think it'd stand a very good shot at WP:GAN. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]