Wikipedia:Peer review/BP Refinery v Tracey/archive1

BP Refinery v Tracey

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would love to go for my first ever Four Award, which inevitably means getting an article I created to FA status. I have gotten decent at getting my work through DYK and GA, but FA eludes me. I was wondering if I could have people critique my work the same way they would if it were at FA.

Thanks, — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LunaEclipse

Quick source review:

I'm unsure about the Fox News citation here, especially with the contentiousness (I mean, the man was literally fired for posting an Internet meme with Hitler in it) of the subject at hand. FAC demands the cream of the crop for this type of stuff. Do you have any other sources that can replace it?
I'm going to assume good faith for the CNBC source, as it's from a decently reputable TV channel.

🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 18:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxnaCarta: Some comments above. Z1720 (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720 thanks — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxnaCarta: It has been over 2 months since this received comments. Can this PR be closed and the article nominated at WP:FAC? Z1720 (talk) 06:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no response to the above ping, so I am going to close this PR. Z1720 (talk) 18:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]