Wikipedia:Peer review/Avril Lavigne discography/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to nominate it for FA and would like to get feedback first, to catch any issues before then. Thank you. U990467 (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comments from SSTflyer
As this is a list, not an article, this should be nominated for WP:FL, not FA. You may want to rewrite WP:Proselines currently in the lead section, and fix the dead links. SSTflyer 03:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comments from Aoba47
@U990467: As someone who loves Avril Lavigne, I definitely want to help as much as I can. Here are my comments below:
- Just to restate what SSTflyer has commented above, this should be nominated for WP:FL, not FA. I would recommend looking at FL discography articles to get an understanding on what is expected for this type of article.
- I would combine the first two paragraphs in the lead. I do not see any reason to have a one-sentence paragraph.
- For the lead, you will need references for each time you mention an album or single's sales or chart performance. You reference a majority of this, but there is still some left undocumented. For instance, the last sentence of the second paragraph and the last sentence of the third paragraph needs citation.
- I have typically seen the videography separated into its own article, such as it is done for Madonna videography and Lady Gaga videography (I chose this two as examples since they are FL quality articles) so I would recommend that this be separated into its own article. The new Avril Lavigne videography page would not only include her music videos, but also her video albums, filmography, and television appearances. I know this would mean more work, but I think this would be better than forcing videography and discography into the same article.
- A lot of great work has been done for the actual body of the article. The only two things I would focus on is adding the additional citations to the lead (and combining the first two paragraphs) and splitting the videography into its own article. I hope you find this to be helpful! Aoba47 (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)