Wikipedia:Peer review/Atomic theory/archive1

Atomic theory

Kurzon 19:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it looks good. Nothing additional springs to mind in terms of content, since subatomic particles and quantum models of the atom are covered in greater detail by other articles.

Normally the introduction should provide a brief summary of the article.
There are only three inline citations and the article could use many more.
The article should clarify that "90 degrees" is an angle, rather than a temperature.
In the final section about quantum models, please use — rather than a hyphen for the em dash punctuation.

Thanks. — RJH (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 03:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]