Wikipedia:Peer review/Atomic line filter/archive1

Atomic line filter

On its way to FAC. I'm working on getting a photograph for the top-right of the article. How are the diagrams? This is my first technical article; is it accessible enough? detailed enough? Thanks! -- Rmrfstar 02:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not extraneously bold items outside of the bolding in the lead.~~

Done.

There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.

Which? I don't understand the syntax of your list of examples.

There are several paragraphs that are too short, which sometimes disrupts the flow of the article. These should either be expanded or merged.

I've tried to fill everything out. All that's left is the section with the quotes in ==Applications==.

Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions in US customary units and vice versa. These conversions should keep to similar values of precision. For example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth". Note that the converted unit of measure uses a standard abbreviation, while the source unit is spelled out in the text.

I don't believe this is necessary in this case: wavelengths (even here in the U.S.) are never measured in billions of an inch; just using "nanometers" should be fine. -- Rmrfstar 03:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.

Done.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 23:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I'll continue to work on your points. -- Rmrfstar 03:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should change the references to the way they are in saffron. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 01:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! Thanks, I'll get right on that. -- Rmrfstar 03:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've accomplished that... -- Rmrfstar 09:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]