Aroused (film) is a Good Article that had really helpful feedback with improvements during the good article review process from good article reviewer HumanxAnthro. It helps diversify representation of higher quality articles on Wikipedia, being a documentary film directed by a female film director and about women subjects interviewed for the film. Looking for feedback and input to help improve it even further past good article. Thanks very much for your time, Right cite (talk) 14:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I do not have the time to do a full review for this article. I do not think the lead should use citations or quotes. From my understanding, it is not a common practice for film articles. Instead, the lead should provide a summary, and the body of the article should be the place to use citations and quotes. I believe citations are only used in the lead for controversial information, which I do not think is the case here. I do not find the amount of citations to be particularly helpful, and in fact, I think it makes the lead quite dense, which could turn away readers. This was just my immediate response when I first looked at the article. It is nice to see this kind of topic get attention on Wikipedia so congrats on all of the work you put into this. Aoba47 (talk) 04:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tom (LT): I just realized that the nominator has been permanently banned for abusing multiple accounts after a sock-puppet investigation. How should this peer review be handled? Aoba47 (talk) 04:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I've closed the review. Others are welcome to comment but I expect if the nominator is banned there won't be much action on those comments, and there are already more than enough active and unanswered reviews.--Tom (LT) (talk) 04:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
