Wikipedia:Peer review/Ahnenerbe/archive1
One of the most misunderstood aspects of the Nazi legacy, it was the inspiration for the archealogists in the Indiana Jones movies, and is commonly confused with the Thule Society - though in truth far less esoteric. Could use suggestions on cleaning up the presentation style, as well as ideas on what to include/disclude from the article. (is there such a thing as too many historic images?). I acknowledge that the discussion on Neuschwabenland is missing, as is the formal hierarchy (on talk page) which I can't imagine how to incorporate other than as a prohibitively long chapter of its own. Also, other than Nuremberg trial references, it's very hard to give 'authoritative' references for much of it *frown* Sherurcij 14:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
My comments:
- Too many short sentences/paragraphs. The flow is pretty bad, it could do with a major copy-edit. I'd start with merging together some sections/paragraphs to make it look neater.
* The See also section links to too many non-existant articles.
- fixed, tySherurcij
- There is no External links section.
- History section is very short.
- Get rid of the image galleries and place the images aside the context instead.
- dispute this one, chapters are too short to allow multiple images, gallery seems to work betterSherurcij
- This means there are too many images. Not every image needs to be included that is in those galleries. — Wackymacs 15:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- dispute this one, chapters are too short to allow multiple images, gallery seems to work betterSherurcij
- Some of the images need more specific fair use tags (such as {{film-screenshot}} instead of just {{screenshot}}). Fair use images also need fair use rationales.