Wikipedia:Peer review/5Linx/archive1

5LINX

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… this article is new and well, it needs help Thanks, Gregory Heffley (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Thanks for your work on this article. I think it needs a fair amount of work to better follow the WP:MOS, here are some suggestions for improvement.

I removed the {{new page}} template from the top of the article as it did not meet the criteria for the new article template (the article is several months old already).
A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow. There are quite a few Featured Articles on businesses at Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Business.2C_economics_and_finance which may be useful as models.
The article has one dab link here which needs to be fixed.
Wikipedia does not typically show copyright and registered trademark symbols
The article needs more references, and as much as possible needs to use references from reliable third-party sources that are independent of the subject. See WP:CITE and WP:RS
Even some places that have refs still need a ref to a Reliable source. What makes aymangh.com a reliable source, for one?
My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. {{cite web}} and other cite templates may be helpful.
Per WP:See also the See also section does not usually cite articles that are already linked in the article.
Any chance for some free images? The HQ building? Some of the executives?
This is so short it is hard to say much else. Do make sure to be neutral and avoid sounding like an ad or promotional piece for the company
Please make sure that the existing text includes no copyright violations, plagiarism, or close paraphrasing. For more information on this please see Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. (This is a general warning given in all peer reviews, in view of previous problems that have risen over copyvios.)

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]