Wikipedia:No pre-close summaries, please
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Some discussions require formal closure. When this happens, the person performing the close reads the arguments and assesses the consensus of participants.
Sometimes in these discussions, someone will take it upon themselves to try to count votes or summarize consensus in advance of this process. Please don't. These pre-close summaries serve only to artificially influence subsequent participants. Whether you intend to or not, you're removing nuance and imposing your own sense of what's important/salient in a way that is inappropriate before a discussion is formally closed.
It is especially problematic when performed by someone involved in the discussion, assessing consensus in a way that just so happens to align with that person's perspective. Likewise when these pre-close tallies are given their own sections/headings, breaking up discussion and asking to be read before (or instead of) one reads the actual arguments. Please don't.
It can be interesting to look at headcounts and arguments in a consequential thread, but please keep the tallies to yourself. If you want to articulate what you believe to be the strongest arguments, simply participate in the discussion, but do so from your own perspective, without purporting to speak for everyone else by summarizing.