Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal
Bienvenue to WikiProject Montreal!
- 1.7% List-Class
- 31.4% Stub-Class
- 54.2% Start-Class
- 9.2% C-Class
- 2.3% B-Class
- 0.8% GA-Class
- 0.3% FA-Class
This WikiProject is an attempt to improve, in various ways, English Wikipedia's coverage of the city of Montreal and its metropolitan area. Feel free to contribute however you can! Our key goals include :
- To improve the quality of Montreal-related articles.
- To expand coverage of the city on English Wikipedia, including by translating articles from the French.
- To standardize Montreal-related articles so that they form a cohesive whole.
Specific tasks and instructions are listed below. If you wish to do so, you may also formally join the Project by adding your username to our list of participants. Thank you for any help!
How to help
[edit]
|
|
Assessment
[edit]Montreal articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |||
FL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
GA | 2 | 16 | 19 | 2 | 39 | ||
B | 3 | 15 | 38 | 49 | 4 | 109 | |
C | 3 | 33 | 127 | 246 | 20 | 429 | |
Start | 54 | 621 | 1,793 | 55 | 2,523 | ||
Stub | 4 | 146 | 1,281 | 28 | 1,459 | ||
List | 6 | 20 | 48 | 2 | 4 | 80 | |
Category | 521 | 521 | |||||
Disambig | 26 | 26 | |||||
File | 22 | 22 | |||||
Project | 16 | 16 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 8 | 240 | 249 | |||
Template | 210 | 210 | |||||
NA | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
Other | 9 | 9 | |||||
Assessed | 8 | 115 | 974 | 3,451 | 1,047 | 114 | 5,709 |
Total | 8 | 115 | 974 | 3,451 | 1,047 | 114 | 5,709 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 23,490 | Ω = 5.14 |
Participants
[edit]To join WikiProject Montreal, edit this section and add #{{User|yourusername}} and any comments to the bottom of the following list of members.
- MTLskyline (talk · contribs), South Shore
Robin Hood 1212 (talk · contribs), Montreal- Skeezix1000 (talk · contribs), I would rather not say
- Mtlfiredude (talk · contribs), Mount Royal
- Shawn in Montreal (talk · contribs), Plateau/Mile End
- M3taphysical (talk · contribs), Outremont
- Basser_g (talk · contribs), Saint-Henri, Old Montreal
- Jeangagnon (talk · contribs), Montreal
- Gordalmighty (talk · contribs), Quebec in general
- Peter Horn (talk · contribs), Montreal, Laval, Quebec in general
- Blanchardb (talk · contribs), Somewhere in the off-island suburbs.
Isnobody (talk · contribs), NDG- Freshacconci (talk · contribs), Le Sud-Ouest
Charlesquebec (talk · contribs), Sports- Mars2mogwai (talk · contribs), Montreal
Vieux supporteur de hockey féminin (talk · contribs), hockey féminin, les arénas dans les quartiers et peut être l'architecture des églises catholiques (je suis un ancien curé défroqué)- Cornellier (talk · contribs), Pointe-Claire
- Jeanpetr (talk · contribs), Centre-Ville
- Viola-ness (talk · contribs), "Plateau, Montreal"
- Bob_A_La_Max (talk · contribs),Laval,Montreal
- jefferythomas (talk · contribs), "NDG"
- Callmemirela (talk · contribs), Westmount/NDG
- julientm (talk · contribs), "Montreal Island"
- Letsgetphysical5678 (talk · contribs), "West Island"
- Moonraker (talk · contribs)
- Anna.haywood (talk · contribs) "Outremont"
- StevenBjerke97 (talk · contribs) Centre-Sud/Ville-Marie
- Ccwonders (talk · contribs) "Montreal"
- ICTMontreal (talk · contribs) healing Montreal's 30+ bodies of water starting with Bouchard Creek
- One of Many Tims (talk · contribs) South shore, public transit
Member userbox
[edit]You may place {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal/Userbox}} on your user page to display the following userbox:
This user is a member of WikiProject Montreal. |
This template will add your user page to:
Parentage
[edit]The parents of this WikiProject are WikiProject Quebec, WikiProject Canada, WikiProject Canadian communities and WikiProject Cities.
Similar WikiProjects
[edit]- Provinces/territories
- Communities
|
Templates
[edit]Stubs
[edit]Montreal-related articles may have one or more of the following stubs applied to them, as needed, in addition to, or in lieu of, Canada-specific stubs:
- {{Montreal-stub}} - all Montreal-related stubs
- {{Montreal-geo-stub}}
Talk page banner
[edit]{{WikiProject Montreal}}
- Template to put on Montreal-related talk pages
Montreal Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
- Or
{{WikiProject Canada|montreal=yes}}
- Template to put on Montreal-related talk pages
Canada: Montreal Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Portal
[edit]{{portal|Canada}}
...To be placed in the "see also" section of Montreal related articles if appropriate
Navboxes
[edit]To be placed at the "bottom" of related articles.
- {{Montreal}}
Volunteer recognition
[edit]- This is for outstanding contributions to Canadian related pages on Wikipedia.
- {{subst:The Maple Leaf Award|type=|--your text here--}} to award the Maple Leaf Award
The Silver Maple Leaf Award
Award for editors that contribute to Canada related projects and topics. |
Userbox
[edit]- The userbox for the project is {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal/Userbox}}
This user is a member of WikiProject Montreal. |
Assessment instructions
[edit]An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Montreal}} or {{WikiProject Canada}} project banner: Place this on the talk page of the article
- {{WikiProject Montreal| ... | class=??? |importance=??? ...}}
or
- {{WikiProject Canada|qc=yes|montreal=yes|class=???|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for importance:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Montreal articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Montreal articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Montreal articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Montreal articles)
- if not completed, the article is added to the Category:Unknown-importance Montreal articles.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
See also
[edit]Portals
Categories
Users
Tools
[edit]- Main tool page: toolserver.org
- Reflinks - Edits bare references — adds title/dates etc. to bare references
- Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
- Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
- Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.
External watchlist
[edit]