Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 22
November 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Andya bhai.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mulavelil cheriyanadu (notify | contribs).
- Unused image, seems to be a personal photo. No real description other than "this picture was taken by me" Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused image of the inside of a SuperCuts. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:TheChillBoat.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aproposws (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, very unremarkable image with little encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:ChrisWelch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tekguru@charter.net (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Computer_new.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimothytrotter (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely to have an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, appears to be a theatre production poster so questionable PD-self license Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Click4kids_homepage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Click4kids (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unlikely to be PD-self as it is a webpage screen shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cdrive_wiki_logo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Diamond-optic (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely to have an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use, as a bumper sticker the PD-self license may be suspect. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Club_Atletico_Belgrano.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smabres (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, low quality, replaced by Image:Club Atletico Belgrano 2.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Classic_Isenberg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jackie_Treehorn (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Colonelbydr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Earl_Andrew (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Crossover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raymisterio (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Da_king_of_spade.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raymisterio (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Coneyislandstillwellstation.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 893 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Concorde_Pre-2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Take_Me_Higher (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, low quality with shadowing Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Chelle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Terrorstarts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencycloepdic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Content (2011 Gang of Four album).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aiightnyc (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, likely not PD-self as it is a webpage screen shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, questionable encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion on user, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Stephen J. Prescott II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nateydb (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, was previously used in Stephen J. Prescott II which was deleted. One of the few contributions of this user that has not been deleted. Graham87 04:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Chemcoloursmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Johnpaulnicholas (notify | contribs).
- This image isn't really of anything. To me at least, it's just a blurry mess. Maybe it has some use that I'm not aware of, but there's no way to salvage this picture. Mononomic (talk) 04:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Teddy van Leer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DunnyGunner (notify | contribs).
- Image appears to be of no particularly recognizable person, and is only used on a user's page. Mononomic (talk) 04:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep per WP:AGF. -Nv8200p talk 04:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:YeomanoftheGuard_badge.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hammersfan (notify | contribs).
- Uploader wasn't copyright holder. PhilKnight (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Er, excuse me but yes I am because I made this image myself. Hammersfan, 22/11/08, 21.34 GMT
- The image looks to be homemade to me, and if Hammersfan claims to have made the drawing, how does one say he isn't the artist? Sf46 (talk) 03:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Chevy_Celebrity_Coupe.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Take_Me_Higher (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cc-20060712-130726.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rvanwaning (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unremarkable photo and replaced in Contrail with better images. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cc-20060712-190754.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rvanwaning (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unremarkable photo and replaced in Contrail with better images. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, minimal encyclopedic potential Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Chiibosig.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MetroidPrime3 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal graphic Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:C.o.d.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Uttaranchaudhuri (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, sole contribution of user, low quality, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cabpic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Garth_cleft (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, source provided no longer works but the base IP address is for the school's website which leads me to question the PD-self license tag Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used in deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used in deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used in deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cherubicchild.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russia_Moore (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cooltext24973236.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Drugsbunny (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal graphic Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely to be PD-self Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, lack of information makes determining a usage difficult, the summary states "Ballpark Digest" which to me is likely a source and given the uploaders issues with images per his talk page I question the PD-self license added. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Tagged as move to Commons. -Nv8200p talk 04:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, insufficent information provided to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to depict Brabourne Stadium. Neutral, leaning towards weak keep: we do have a higher-quality replacement, but it doesn't quite cover the same field of view. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:CurtisBlumer_akward.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Soonerfanatic88 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencycloepdic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, looks like an album cover -- if it is then the GFDL-self license maybe questionable Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Solacelastshow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaazmar (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, likely used on a deleted band article Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, looks like an album cover -- if it is then the GFDL-self license maybe questionable Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, it is a scan of a CD - not likely to be PD-self Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, looks like an cassette tape cover -- if it is then the PD-self license maybe questionable Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, likely used on a deleted band article Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Magcover radioprogramma nanamouskouri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Speedoflight (notify | contribs).
- Cover of a magazine that is not discussed, used to show what a living person looks like. Damiens.rf 16:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Nadia ali cleo magazine cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Househead.d (notify | contribs).
- NOn-free magazine cover is only used to support a POVy original research discussion about the model pictured: "...a testament to her growing influence in that region of the world..." Damiens.rf 17:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map, relatively confusing because it only shows one state of australia rather than the country Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:LocMap_Litchfield.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tiles (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map, relatively confusing because it only shows one state of australia rather than the country Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map, relatively confusing because it only shows one state of australia rather than the country Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:LocMap_Keep_River.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tiles (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map, relatively confusing because it only shows one state of australia rather than the country Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The image may be meaningful and relevant but it is not significant to the article. There is no commentary about the image itself that the image is needed to support. - Nv8200p talk 04:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Making_the_Band_4_live_finale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Flyer22 (notify | contribs).
- Doesn't meaningfully add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 18:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Policy does not use the words "meaningfully"... Use of images in this way are simply required to inhance the reader's understanding of the article and only be used when they're in direct correlation to significant or substantial information being discussed about what they are displaying. Well, that is exactly the case with use of this image. It is being used in direct correlation to significant and substantial information about singer Aubrey O'Day's dismissal from the group Danity Kane. I thought very carefully before uploading this image and made sure that it was relevant. I do not see how it does not inhance the reader's understanding of what happened. I mean, are we to assume that most readers know what the Total Request Live stage looked like where Sean Combs addressed O'Day's dismissal? Yes, readers can imagine four of the five women together on stage discussing the dismissal, but it is not like what is going on in their heads would be exactly correct or that close to the actual visual. I mention four of five, because singer D. Woods was not there, which the image and text also convey; the image conveys that fact with an impactful reality. This is not a matter of being told of a white T-shirt with black letters, which can easily be envisioned more precisely. Furthermore, there are many images on Wikipedia where articles can do without them but are still very much relevant and inhances the articles' readability. Flyer22 (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The policy says "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." PhilKnight (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PhilKnight, I am pointing out that many Wikipedia articles, including ones of Good and Featured status, have images that would not be detrimental to that article's understanding if removed. No, I am not merely saying that other stuff exists, but I am saying that this image does inhance the reader's understanding of the article. It is not like it is there just to pretty up the article; it is there corresponding to significant information being relayed about that event. For both of the articles it is being used in. That section in the Danity Kane article about O'Day's departure from this group is pretty substantial, for example. Flyer22 (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The policy says "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." PhilKnight (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The is no objective supported commentary that this image conveys anything significant to the article. It just illustrates what the ladies looked like.- Nv8200p talk 04:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Aundrea_and_Aubrey_-_Main,_Main.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Flyer22 (notify | contribs).
- Doesn't meaningfully add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This image follows up the text noting their friendship, from Season 1 of Making the Band 3. It shows these two singers clearly at that point in time, something that their individual articles do not do. The main reason this image enhance's the article's readability is that it so strongly conveys how this band started out. Though not officially made at that time, it started out with these two: Aubrey O'Day and Aundrea Fimbres. O'Day and Fimbres and their bond were the main reason viewers watched this series at that time, which is also hinted at in the text. The text notes O'Day as the show's breakout star, which is referenced, and this image displays O'Day and her appearance at that time for readers. Their looks, as in clothing style and hair, have drastically changed since then (not so much the hair on Fimbres's part, but still), and this image better relays how things were at that time than words alone. It is displaying O'Day and Fimbres having made it through Round 1 of the competition and the foundation on which the group was formed. Flyer22 (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Qi empress of Sin Don.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Enerelt (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image rationale does not satisfy WP:FUC and WP:RAT. Non-free movie screenshots may only be used for the purpose of critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents, which doesn't happen here. In its intended use in the articles Qi Empress and Ukhaantu Khan, Emperor Huizong of Yuan, the image does not increase the reader's understanding of those topics, but only serves as decoration. Latebird (talk) 22:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Anne-Curtis05.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mystique rhodora (notify | contribs).
- Unused image Soundvisions1 (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep for the Sons of Confederate Veterans article only. Since the license incorporates the copyrighted logo, I don't believe it could qualify for PD-ineligible. The Sons of Confederate Veterans article is the only article that has enough commentary on the license to raise doubt that it shouldn't be deleted completely. -Nv8200p talk 03:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:LAplateSonsOfConfederate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sf46 (notify | contribs).
- Fails WP:NFCC#8. Not necessary in any of the uses for reader understanding; none of the uses has critical commentary on the image. Fails also WP:NFCC#1. The text in the articles suffices to say that vehicle owners can request a state-issued license plate featuring the Sons of Confederate Veterans logo. A PD-exempt image could show a vanity plate. —teb728 t c 23:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree; I believe that the image does meet the requirements of NFCC#8. Also, a vanity plate and the Sons of Confederate Veterans plate are not the same at all. Qqqqqq (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you elaborate on how omission of the image would be detrimental to readers' understanding of the articles? —teb728 t c 06:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I started to below, but after looking over the articles in which this image is used, I think it's probably only Vehicle registration plates of Louisiana where the image is needed for understanding the article. In the other articles, the image merely supplements and is not necessarily integral. But in this one article, I feel that images of each type of Louisiana license plate are necessary for an understanding of the material presented. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article does not show the EMT plate, and I don't feel any loss of understanding because of its absence. —teb728 t c 07:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps there should be an image of the EMT plate as well. If you wanted to know what said plate looked like, you would not from reading this article. Qqqqqq (talk) 07:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article does not show the EMT plate, and I don't feel any loss of understanding because of its absence. —teb728 t c 07:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I started to below, but after looking over the articles in which this image is used, I think it's probably only Vehicle registration plates of Louisiana where the image is needed for understanding the article. In the other articles, the image merely supplements and is not necessarily integral. But in this one article, I feel that images of each type of Louisiana license plate are necessary for an understanding of the material presented. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I also disagree. No other vanity or specialty license plate could illustrate this topic. An entire section is devoted to discussing the plates. I'm not sure what the basis is for calling it "non-free" - are license plate designs copyrighted? This seems similar to a logo. The use in the article certainly does nothing to damage the commercial opportunities. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, if a license plate includes non-trivial imagery (like the Sons of Confederate Veterans logo on the this plate), the design of the plate is copyrighted. The Louisiana Department of Public Safety Terms of Use indicates that this image and their other site content are not licensed under a free license. And indeed the {{non-free fair use in}} tag on the image recognizes that it is copyrighted and unlicensed.
- Wikipedia’s policy on non-free content strongly limits the use of non-free content on Wikipedia. The reason for this policy is that Wikipedia has a goal of creating reusable content, and non-free content hinders the reuseability of an article. According to the policy, “Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.” It is not enough that an article mention the subject of the image; the image must be important for readers understanding of the article.
- You mention logos. Typically logos are also non-free images, and the use of non-free logos is also restricted on Wikipedia. With few if any exceptions they are allowed only for identification of the subject of the article. —teb728 t c 06:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I, for one, feel that including the image is important for a reader's understanding of the concept of the Confederate flag appearing on a state-issued license plate in the modern era. Is a free version of this concept available anywhere? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think most of the articles say in text that the plates show the Confederate battle flag. (If they don’t that could be added easily.) If you feel it necessary to show what the flag looks like, Image:Battle flag of the US Confederacy.svg is a free image. —teb728 t c 07:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I, for one, feel that including the image is important for a reader's understanding of the concept of the Confederate flag appearing on a state-issued license plate in the modern era. Is a free version of this concept available anywhere? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I also disagree with deletion. The image illustrates how the Sons of Confederate Veterans logo and the Confederate battle flag are used in the design of these license plates. Without an illusTration, a reader could be mistaken into thinking the the battle flag covers the whole background field of the plate or that the logo is displayed less prominently than it actually is on the plate.Sf46 (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This plate may well be {{PD-ineligible}} under U.S. law. The textual elements of the plate are not eligible for copyright, and the Confederate battle flag, if it ever was copyrightable, has long since fallen into the public domain. Subtracting these, the only remaining features on the plate are the hexagonal frames around the text surrounding the flag, which are probably simple enough to fall under "common geometric figures or shapes" as per [1]. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.