Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 July 4)
July 4
[edit]
- Image:Jeroldpromotional.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tbsmcr (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:JesParis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JarodArthur (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jesse_Lacey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eric_morris005 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jessica_Ryckewaert_Marimba.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRyckewaert (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. Freely licensed, of possible future value. Transfer to commons is, of course, possible. WilyD 13:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jessie_Coleman_in_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xscapefilms (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Jessie Coleman was deleted following this AfD; it is very conceivable that her notability will increase (or inclusion standards will relax) within a fewer years resulting in recreation. And there is really nothing unencyclopedic about the image; please stop throwing the term around so loosely. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If the article was deleted for her being non-notable (i.e. unencyclopedic) then it is safe to say her image is unencyclopedic also. -Nv8200p talk 02:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think since it's a very nice image and with a good license it's very possible it will be useable in the future. I'd hate to delete it and then have us need it soon and be unable to reobtain. Maybe put it up on WikiCommons? Vickser (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure that I buy that the uploader is the copyright holder, but if someone thinks the image will stick on Commons, I'll support moving it. -Nv8200p talk 02:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Jesu.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stalinvino (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. Now in use. WilyD 14:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jeton_kelmendi_1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Letrat (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added to Kelmendi#Jeton_Kelmendi. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a free image that's no longer orphaned. Vickser (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. I don't think I need to explain. WilyD 14:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jewgleit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Firefoxobsession (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an orphan that I can't possibly see any good use for. Vickser (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Deleted, no source provided to make tag verifiable —Angr 12:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I've added it to the guy's biography. WilyD 14:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Jgg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrsexxxxxxxxxxx (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jgg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jgorauskas (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody cares. WilyD 14:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jhlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jasenhudson (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody wants it. WilyD 14:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Jhun_1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mahadi_mahmud (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- commons - Stunning image, (assuming it is GDFL) Fasach Nua (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per its use here [1] it's obviously a non-free work from a copyrighted work of fiction, like several others from the same uploader. Falsely tagged as self-made/free. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody seems to want it. WilyD 14:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jig_Halloween_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Whitney1110 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. No longer orphaned, allegations of copyright violation not substantiated. WilyD 14:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:JillsHeadshot-printable8x10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moviebuff123 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added to Jillian Murray. Keep as there's no reason to suspect copyvio and it's no longer orphaned. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Desertbus.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ZeroRaider (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation — pd_THOR | =/\= | 07:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Resolution vs. DOF.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guiding light (notify | contribs).
- Image converted to PNG: Image:Resolution vs. DOF.png Han-Kwang (t) 08:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both jpg and png files are accepted formats for uploads. In fact, when I did a comparison of png format and jpg format conversion I found jpg takes up less data capacity. When I selected jpg format for my file uploads I was following the practice of economy of data capacity.Guiding light (talk) 09:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Format conversion alone does not justify the deletion.Guiding light (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: the original jpg actually contains erroneous content. A newly updated png has corrected content. The png format is retained due to its better quality. Deletion of the jpg file is approved at this point. Thanks. Guiding light (talk) 01:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.
- Yes, in the article it is not mentioned. I have no comment as to its deletion. PMK1 (talk) 12:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. While I'm not one to be strict in NFCC#8, this is the logo of a community centre which isn't mentioned in the article. Decorative is the right word. WilyD 13:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Communitycentrelogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMK1 (notify | contribs).
- Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.
- Name is too generic, delete and protect Fasach Nua (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is not decorative. The section clearly talks about the Macedonians in Queanbeyan. The article clearly talks about the Macedonian community of Queanbeyan and that is the logo that they have chosen to use for themselves. I believe it enhances the quality of the article. PMK1 (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. A tougher call than the previous logo, but the article contains no discussion of KUD Razigrana Makedonka, Queanbeyan, something I had to research externally. With one-half a sentence on KUD Razigrana Makedonka, this is really an "offhand mention", not explored in any depth whatsoever. If the info on KUD Razigrana Makedonka, Queanbeyan was spun off into a seperate article, it'd be speedied by A7, or possibly an overeager A1. WilyD 14:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:RazigranaMakedonka.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMK1 (notify | contribs).
- Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.
- The image is not decorative. The section clearly talks about the Razigrana Makedonka KUD. It would serve of purpose to the users if the KUD's logo is displayed. It is clearly the Cultural and Folkloric wing of the Macedonians in Queanbeyan. Decorative is no good excuse.PMK1 (talk) 12:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Logo of organisation not discussed in article. Fails #8, as it is decorative. WilyD 14:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.
- If you have noticed i have not yet finished the section about the Macedonians in Victoria. The FOMKUDV is an important organisation amongst the Macedonians in Victoria. Untill i finish that section or other users do being "decorative" is not a good enough excuse. PMK1 (talk) 12:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. Concerns appear to have been addressed. WilyD 17:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The contrast and brightness of the image is such that it is impossible to discern a face on a CRT monitor. Sceptre (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's easily fixed.Vexorg (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I vote this image isn't deleted. it's well within fair use. Let's not devalue wikipedia by being too trigger happy. Vexorg (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as image contrast has been fixed since deletion nomination. Guroadrunner (talk) 11:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Problematic licence. WilyD 14:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Vogue Theater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimmy Kustes (notify | contribs).
- Only licensing is a deprecated PD template. Appears to be a possibly copyrighted image from Louisville.com, and there's no proof that the uploader is the copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Accusation that it fails NFCC#8 is uncontested. WilyD 14:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Hotaru Tomoe Mita Mao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Masamage (notify | contribs).
- Image does not seem to meet WP:NFCC criteria #8, in that it doesn't add much to the reader's ability to understand the subject (Hotaru Tomoe) Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 20:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah. This doesn't really need a full-fledged IFD, though; it could have been brought up at the article's talk page first, and the editor-community there would be pretty easy to talk into getting rid of it. (We're trying to get on top of image stuff like this. Some of the other character articles have pictures of the musical actresses as well.) --Masamage ♫ 22:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't know about that, sorry. Could you please provide a link to the discussion. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 01:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's nothing yet. I just meant that there could have been; admittedly, I'm a fan of not going into big processes unless they're absolutely needed. Anyway, I'll point the other watchers of that article toward this page. I think deleting the image will probably be fine. --Masamage ♫ 04:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't know about that, sorry. Could you please provide a link to the discussion. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 01:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah. This doesn't really need a full-fledged IFD, though; it could have been brought up at the article's talk page first, and the editor-community there would be pretty easy to talk into getting rid of it. (We're trying to get on top of image stuff like this. Some of the other character articles have pictures of the musical actresses as well.) --Masamage ♫ 22:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Jitin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jitingulati (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Pacciani_2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tetsuounit (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody objects. WilyD 14:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jinniku_2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tetsuounit (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Jiveroom.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Worcnagrom (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jjonstreetsofnyc2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stanleyjason31 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept lack of consensus to delete, no compelling policy arguments either way. WilyD 17:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jlojsl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xuchilbara (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Uploader took a break for a month; good chance of returning seeing as the user has been active for 2 years. User may decide to use this in userspace; there'd be nothing wrong with that. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, no objectors.
- Image:Jman871.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jmccabe871 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Problematic licensing information. If someone can confirm that the Nevada Shakespeare Company actually released this into the public domain, harrass me and I'll expedite it through OTRS. Cheers, WilyD 14:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jmheadshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Josiewarvelle (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,
Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Keep. It's a free photo Jeanmarie Simpson which may be used there in the future, uploader is likely to return, and there's nothing unencyclopedic about it. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no evidence that the Nevada Shakespeare Company released this photo for use in the public domain. Probably would need an e-mail to OTRS to keep. -Nv8200p talk 02:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none dissenting. WilyD 17:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_Oakland.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Image:Joanne_&_Taye_(7-21-07)_Oakland.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skull_&_Bones (notify | contribs).
_Oakland.JPG&action=delete){kind=link}
_Oakland.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Oakland.JPG&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_Oakland.JPG){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody objects. WilyD 16:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_Oakland.JPG){kind=link}
- Image:JocelynMEdwards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FathomOz (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. Transfer to commons is, of course, possible. WilyD 14:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jockstrap_Rear_View_01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons; someone may find a use for it. Uploader also may return based on contribution history. — xDanielx T/C\R 11:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jock_rider.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Darius1991 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jocksniffing02.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jockstrap_Views_01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody objected. WilyD 16:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jodha_Aakbar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cheekyme_93 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody objected. WilyD 16:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Image:Joe_&_Joey's_Daily_Life_(End_Of_The_World).png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sampo_Sheep (notify | contribs).
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody cares. WilyD 16:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}
- Image:Joe,_Joey,_Young_Joe,_Young_Joey.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sampo_Sheep (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, no objecters. WilyD 21:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joe_X.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schismberg (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Unused, no objecters. WilyD 21:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joe-Alliance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schismberg (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, nobody appears to want it. WilyD 13:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joe-lemer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Whitmorewolveyr (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Kept. Having an image of the obituary does not infringe the copyright upon the obituary anymore than quoting it in its entirity does, nor does repeating its text two, three or a Graham's number of times within a single document alter how minimal or not the usage is. While one might question whether the shortness of the obituary is original research, this is not clearly elucidate in this discussion. Realistically, while in use the most reasonable conclusion is that it's not, but either way no consensus exists here. WilyD 14:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_obit.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Image:Edward_Sheriff_Curtis_(1868-1952)_obit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_) (notify | contribs).
_obit.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
_obit.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_obit.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Unnecessary fair use image. You don't need a scan of the small obituary to show that it was a small obituary. Garion96 (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks fine to me, the visual impact of a great man and a small biography needs a visual reference. The smallness of his obit is mentioned in each biography, and you don't see how truly small it is until its right in front of you. The visual impact had no effect on Garion96, but it did on me. The tiny obit was also featured at the Museum of Natural History in New York for the same reason. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Looks apropos, and should stay. The fair use rationale is fine and the obit lends considerable interest to the article...Modernist (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_obit.jpg){kind=link}
-2008-07-04T21:40:00.000Z-Image:Edward_Sheriff_Curtis_(1868-1952)_obit.jpg){kind=link}
_obit.jpg){kind=link}
- Image fails criteria 1 (just state that it was a small obituary) and criteria 8 of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Garion96 (talk) 15:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In your opinion, in my opinion it passes criteria 8, the image provides historical and valuable information and therefore stays..Please sign your edits in the future, thank you..Modernist (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Note that the full text of the obituary (which is also copyrighted as text) is additionally included in the article not once, but twice, leading to a threefold representation of this copyrighted item. If the "terseness" and shortness of the obituary is something particularly notable, source that observation, otherwise it's OR anyway, and even if you can source it you only need the literal text once, at most. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In your opinion, in my opinion it passes criteria 8, the image provides historical and valuable information and therefore stays..Please sign your edits in the future, thank you..Modernist (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
_obit.jpg){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_obit.jpg){kind=link}
- Image:Joe4643desat2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aemberygood (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:JoeValenti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Play16makr (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none opposed. WilyD 16:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joee_at_3_month.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bluejax258 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none opposed. WilyD 16:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, no objecters. WilyD 16:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joey_timson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Canaanchapman (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 21:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joeyrahimi1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Collegeprowler (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Deleted. Orphaned, with none objecting. WilyD 13:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Joflute.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gregory.lussier (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.