Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 November 26
Appearance
November 26
[edit]- User:Nostradamus1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-encyclopedic ofphaned image. Fictional modern-style flag claimed to be that of medieval, Eurasian nomad state. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 14:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Non-encylopedic orphaned image. Linking article was speedily deleted. jonny-mt(t)(c)Tell me what you think! 04:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Subjectcinema (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. Probably won't be used again. -- Swerdnaneb 06:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jeanmorris (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- commercial, orphan, unencyclopedic Warut (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- think outside the box (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned / Not in use
- think outside the box (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned / Not in use
- Keep and move to Commons. The image is potentially useful. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jeanmorris (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- commercial, orphan, unencyclopedic Warut (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Amjohnson86 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not is use/possible Copyright violation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.10.204.213 (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- I find it odd that the nominator, an anonymous editor, is the same one who changed the licensing information on the image. But even so, the licensing information before was contradictory and sounded a lot like WP:CSD#I3, and the image is not used anyway, so delete. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- The reason that I changed it was because I was approached by the creator of the picture. I couldn't remember my log-in password for Amjohnson86 so I just did it without a log-in because I wanted to be sure that it would be taken off quickly. That's why it was removed and I'm asking for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.151.124 (talk) 14:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fails WP:NFCC#8 (significance), and is poor quality too (JPEG instead of PNG) —Remember the dot (talk) 22:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for NFCC#8, since it's identical to the non-SP1 image except for version number; but I would note that being poor quality is, to a certain extent, actually an asset rather than a liability for fair use images, since it aids claims of fair use: see NFCC#3b "Low rather than high resolution & fidelity ... is used'". -- simxp (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's referring to resolution, not format. The improper format (JPEG) of this image doesn't do us any good. In fact, it makes it harder to read the text on the image. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)