Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 10

< July 9	July 11 >

July 10

Image:Billcommand.JPG

Image:Billcommand.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Foxie McCloud (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BilsdaleB1257-1.jpg

Image:BilsdaleB1257-1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Mazeteam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BilsdaleTVmast1.jpg

Image:BilsdaleTVmast1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Mazeteam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BimaG_Kickflip_BS_Tailslide.jpg

Image:BimaG_Kickflip_BS_Tailslide.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Telanjanggmail (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Biography_of_William_Holmes.pdf

Image:Biography_of_William_Holmes.pdf (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Webduck (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image is an unnecessary copy of Image:Johnny Yong Bosch.jpg, with unneeded text added at the bottom — EmperorBrandon 02:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some anon IP keeps adding it to the Johnny Yong Bosch article as well. It's getting annoying. --Guess Who 00:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bitbangalore.jpg

Image:Bitbangalore.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Darcwader (notify | contribs).

No evidence uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Startrackcrew.jpg

Image:Startrackcrew.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cfauteux (notify | contribs).

Orphaned screenshot of a non-noteworthy Star Trek fan production. —Bkell (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Startrack.jpg

Image:Startrack.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cfauteux (notify | contribs).

Orphaned screenshot of a non-noteworthy Star Trek fan production. —Bkell (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fredthompsonwatergate.jpg

Image:Fredthompsonwatergate.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Stills64 (notify | contribs).

Obsolete, replacing Image:Fredthompsonwatergate.jpg with Image:Fredthompsonwatergate2.jpg — Stills64 03:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Praying hands.jpg

Image:Praying hands.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Remiel (notify | contribs).

Orphan, seems to have been replaced by Image:Albrecht Dürer Betende Hände.jpg on the Commons. —Bkell (talk) 03:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Uploader not notified, as he or she has exercised the right to vanish and consequently the user talk page has been deleted [1]. —Bkell (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pooh.jpg

Image:Pooh.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Nv8200p (notify | contribs).

This is a photograph of a Copyrighted work, therefore it is a derivative work copyrighted by Disney, not the uploader. — Tcrow777 talk 04:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This one is a little more complicated -- in fact there's a section in Commons:Derivative works that is devoted to this exact example. If the purpose of the photo of the stuffed animal to depict Winnie the Pooh (the character), then its use is unacceptable. If the purpose is to show an example of Pooh merchandise, then it's acceptable, but the Pooh likeness is still included under fair use. howcheng {chat} 23:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But this is just a photo of Pooh, not anything else, therefore your example does not apply. Tcrow777 talk 04:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw This image is under fair-use, just as long as the false GFDL licensing is corrected. Tcrow777 talk 06:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted As a derivative, the image was not being used in a manner that passed WP:NFCC. -Nv8200p talk 00:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remaining ship and submarine photos used only by permission

The following photos are used only by permission and do not have a clear claim to fair use. If any user feels that one of them would qualify for fair use, they are welcome to scale down the image and write a rationale for it. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HMS Achilles (Leander-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Apollo F70 (Leander-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Avenger (F185) with RFA Fort Austin (A386).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by Gdr (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Cardiff D108 (Type 42 destroyer).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Challenger.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by Hammersfan 1 (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Danae F47 (Leander-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Diomede (Leander-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Gurkha F122 (Tribal-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Jersey (P295).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Leeds Castle (P258).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Newcastle D87 (Type 42 destroyer).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Penelope F127 (Leander-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Tartar F133 (Tribal-class frigate).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

Image:HMS Upholder S40.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by Lord Bob (notify | contribs).

Image:Hms-antrim-d18.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-appleleaf-a79.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-bluerover-a270.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-greenrover-a268.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-greyrover-a269.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-reliant-a131.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-sircaradoc-l3522.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-spapool-a222.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-tarbatness-a345.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-tidespring-a75.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-wavelaird-a119.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfa-wavesovereign-a211.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfatidepool(A76).jpg (delete|talk|history|logs)- uploaded by David Newton (notify | contribs).

Image:Nana Morimura.jpg

Image:Nana Morimura.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jie (notify | contribs).

Current license is for Wikipedia use only. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JohannesKornfeld04.jpg

Image:JohannesKornfeld04.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Ivan2004 (notify | contribs).

Current license is for Wikipedia use only. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Itsrainingmenpic.jpg

Image:Itsrainingmenpic.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Hotwiki (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#1 (replaceable by a free image to show the appearance of the singer) and WP:NFCC#8 (does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot). Videmus Omnia 07:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: That's really useless thing for you to do. The pic is useful for the 2 articles. --SuperHotWiki 07:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. ACK Videmus Omnia. Neither of the articles even attempt to critically discuss the video or the contents of the screen shot in a detailed manner. Anrie 10:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Miraclevideo.jpg

Image:Miraclevideo.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. Does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia 07:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Save the image. It is a screencap from the Miracle DVD "making of the album". In this screencap Dion is recording her title song Miracle. It is the only video of this song. Max24 01:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry to sound flippant, but so what? How does this image increase readers' understanding of the single? howcheng {chat} 23:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Most articles about songs have screencaps of a video. And there's nothing wrong with that. And this article doesn't include informations in the text what happens in the video. So thanks to this screencap you can see how it looks like. Max24 19:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that the article doesn't describe what happens in the video supports the removal of the picture, not the other way around. Anrie 21:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloc_Party_-_Bernau_2007.jpg

Image:Bloc_Party_-_Bernau_2007.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Wwfc 1877 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 09:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Transistor signal.png

Image:Transistor signal.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Ksd5 (notify | contribs).

It has nothing to do with transformers, and is just a copy of the Image:Bitmap VS SVG.svg file, with no GIMP/INKSCAPE titles, and it changed to have transistor-related captions that make no sense, considering it's not about transistors. It also has a very ugly copyright information bit at the bottom. This is not used anywhere, and I see no way it could possibly be used. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 10:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons showing through. -Nv8200p talk 00:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LKS_cast.jpg

Image:LKS_cast.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kingkida (notify | contribs).

Photo of the cast of a show. Shows nothing that free images of the actor wouldn't show. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LA_Law.jpg

Image:LA_Law.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by HeMan5 (notify | contribs).

Cast of actors. Used decoratively in the article, and free images could replace – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used for identification purpsoses, the article IS about a TV show is it not?! What free images could you find to replace this with, pray tell?!? This is a copyrighted TV show, if there are free images why haven't you uploaded them, instead of just pointing it out. Why don't you make yourself useful instead of just deleting imagesHeMan5 16:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now-now, try to remain civil. Non-free images of living persons are not allowed to be used for identification purposes, especially if the actors and actresses are still alive and one can reasonably expect free images to be (or become) available. I vote delete. Anrie 16:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LS_first_gen_testing.jpg

Image:LS_first_gen_testing.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Enigma3542002 (notify | contribs).

Back in November, I deemed this image non-replaceable, since it depicts the initial testing of this vehicle before its mass production. However, I now doubt it passed NFCC#8. Any opinions would be appreciated. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In consideration of NFCC#8, Significance, I acknowledge your concerns that the non-free image available may possibly be unnecessary. I am therefore replacing that image with a free image that I have recently made available. Enigma3542002 23:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! I love hearing that. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seasonthree2.jpg

Image:Seasonthree2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jwebby91 (notify | contribs).

High-res non-free photo of the cast of a show. Could be replaced by free images of the actors, or, if that is for some reason impossible, with screenshot(s) of the fictional characters, which would be only a small percentage of a copyrighted work as opposed to 100% of a non-free image. — Videmus Omnia 13:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LUhistory2.jpg

Image:LUhistory2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Alberto Fernandez (notify | contribs).

I think this is decorative and replaceable. Comments? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replaceable, delete. Videmus Omnia 14:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LWord_Cast.jpg

Image:LWord_Cast.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Klinean (notify | contribs).

Simply shows actresses. Used decoratively (and boy is it decorative!) in the article. I can't say it shows nothing that free images of the actresses wouldn't show, but it shows nothing encyclopedic that free images wouldn't show. ;-) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LCS4-cast.jpg

Image:LCS4-cast.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Vossman (notify | contribs).

Cast of comics. Shows nothing that free replacements of individual comics wouldn't show. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LERSUS_MMS_Scheme.JPG

Image:LERSUS_MMS_Scheme.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dmitri Andreychenko (notify | contribs).

Used decoratively -- I think. It's hard to tell how it's being used. Anyway, it's not necessary in the article. (Someone should look through the other non-free images in the article as well.) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isktre.jpg

Image:Isktre.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Theory of deadman (notify | contribs).

Orphan, low quality image. Not sure what it was/can be used for. matt br 15:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Design for Generalissimo of the Soviet Union.GIF

Image:Design for Generalissimo of the Soviet Union.GIF (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dvobgo92 (notify | contribs).

Image that not a poster but a military insignia but not from Generalissimo of the Soviet Union, it is insignia from Marshal of the Soviet Union see. Snake BGD_talk 15:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a problem that should be fixed, not a problem that requires deletion. Isn't pre 195..whenever Stalin died Soviet stuff now of expired copyright anyhow? Wily D 19:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I ask this image to be deleted because i already fix the problem and we don't need another copy of marshal of hte soviet union insigina.

Snake BGD_talk 09:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bhungra.jpg

Image:Bhungra.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Zohaibhsn (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, inactive uploader FPT 15:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:He_ate_me_by_suzi9mm.jpg

Image:He_ate_me_by_suzi9mm.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dainethecook (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, personal and unencyclopedic image. FPT 15:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jr_259.jpg

Image:Jr_259.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Steverobles (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, personal and unencyclopedic image, uploader has two contribs FPT 15:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:McClure_.jpg

Image:McClure_.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by FreeTibet (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, inactive uploader FPT 15:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MHerrington_transit.jpg

Image:MHerrington_transit.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Buron444 (notify | contribs).

A 3-page advert spread. Adverts are very likely to pass as "fair use", legally, but I believe its use is merely decorative – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 16:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P9100716.jpg

Image:P9100716.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AStudent (notify | contribs).

Probable Copyright violation. User claims PD-self on a pic downloaded from a web site. howcheng {chat} 16:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC_2535.jpg

Image:DSC_2535.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AStudent (notify | contribs).

User claims PD-self on an image downloaded from a web site. howcheng {chat} 16:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Msu-um-2001b.jpg

Image:Msu-um-2001b.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AStudent (notify | contribs).

This non-free screenshot is not necessary in understanding the article, violating WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 16:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC_2961.jpg

Image:DSC_2961.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AStudent (notify | contribs).

Probable Copyright violation. User claims PD-self on an image downloaded from a web site. howcheng {chat} 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC_5048.jpg

Image:DSC_5048.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AStudent (notify | contribs).

Probable Copyright violation. User claims PD-self on an image downloaded from a web site. howcheng {chat} 16:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoshTurnerWouldyougowithmevideocap.JPG

Image:JoshTurnerWouldyougowithmevideocap.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Camcallister (notify | contribs).

This non-free music video screenshot is being used only for decorative purposes. There is no critical commentary on it whatsoever. Also, lacking a fair use rationale. howcheng {chat} 17:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NYlphieconvention.jpg

Image:NYlphieconvention.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Skandalicious (notify | contribs).

In one sense, the image is nonreplaceable, since they may not meet in NY again. But is it important to have the image be of NY? Is the image useful at all? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:NEED_YOUR_LOVE.jpg

Image:NEED_YOUR_LOVE.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bakahito (notify | contribs).

Used only decoratively in article about the band. No commentary on this specific image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Moved to article about the album itself. howcheng {chat} 17:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:DAINeedYourLove.jpg

Image:DAINeedYourLove.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bakahito (notify | contribs).

Used only decoratively in article about the band. No commentary on this specific image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Moved to article about album. howcheng {chat} 17:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NYL_Ryo_Design.jpg

Image:NYL_Ryo_Design.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bakahito (notify | contribs).

Used only decoratively in article about the band. No commentary on this specific image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NYLVANCLOTHS.jpg

Image:NYLVANCLOTHS.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bakahito (notify | contribs).

Used only decoratively in article about the band. No commentary on this specific image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kilsythmap.jpg

Image:Kilsythmap.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Mahobaly (notify | contribs).

Image:Stick jump 4-14-07 youtube safe0001.gif

Image:Stick jump 4-14-07 youtube safe0001.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Good friend100 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, nonsense — --Cheers, Komdori 19:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Allison_Janney.jpg

Image:Allison_Janney.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by BCV (notify | contribs).

Previously nominated a year ago and closed by me as a keep. However, the intervening time span, it has become clear to me that {{promotional}} is the most abused image template. Without proof that it comes from a press kit (and not just nbc.com), this image has to go. Recommend replacement with a still frame from an episode. howcheng {chat} 19:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it does seem like a promo photo and as it's no longer used on the site we are in no way competing with their interest of drawing visitors to their site. -N 03:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep too much baseless paranoia involving the promo tag, sure there is some abuse but when you can clearly see that these photo's were released to promote the show it should not be an issue. Used in publications at the time of the West Wing was in production such as TV guide and websites that reference the show such as Yahoo TV when it was on the air. These images are not copyrighted to the extent that it is illegal for wikipedia to use them. BCV 01:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Prove it. Find a link to somewhere on NBC.com that says the images on its web site can be used by anyone in order to promote its shows. Unforunately, you can't, because their terms of use state, "You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit, publicly display, prepare derivative works based on, or distribute in any way any material from the Service." howcheng {chat} 17:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. While we can claim fair use from a TV screenshot, we can't go ripping photos off of someone's website. If NBC is using these images to attract visitors to their website, then our use directly competes with their's. That's not fair use. --BigΔT 02:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~As stated on the image description the West Wing page on the NBC site is no longer live. The image is not in fact being used on the NBC site. -N 19:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]
Change to delete I was fooled by the archive.org url on the image description page. There is in fact a West Wing page still on nbc.com, and while this photo doesn't seem to be on it at the moment, NBC as the copyright holder could change it back. I recommend using a less-infringing self made screencap. -N 00:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Large-msg-114133105702-2.jpg

Image:Large-msg-114133105702-2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Pantscraper2 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image; appears to be unencyclopedic, private photo. — Tlesher 20:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mohamed_Abdelaziz_of_Western_Sahara.jpg

Image:Mohamed_Abdelaziz_of_Western_Sahara.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Koavf (notify | contribs).

Press photo, multi-national or not, aren't free. I don't see any evidence to back up the claim that it's been released into the public domain. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 20:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Granted it's probably not PD, but couldn't fair use be invoked on the Mohamed Abdelaziz article, in order to save it from being deleted? Pepsidrinka 01:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Doubtful. Images of living persons that merely show what they look like are almost always disallowed under the non-free content policy; see the fifth and eighth examples of unacceptable use. —Bkell (talk) 01:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jtband.jpg

Image:Jtband.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Azthetik (notify | contribs).

This image is actually a cropped publicity shot of the band Anberlin, not the currently-under-AFD band it's being represented as. An example of proper use can be seen here. — Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pa_rbd_latin_07.jpg

Image:Pa_rbd_latin_07.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Surebuddywhat00 (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary unfree screenshot showing part of a band for which we have free images available Abu badali ^(talk) 21:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BendigoRaidersIceHockey.jpg

Image:BendigoRaidersIceHockey.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Akunadigital (notify | contribs).

Digital watermark, could easily be replaced with an image with out watermark, basiclly an ad. — Samuel 21:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Ew delete and delete any others they may have uploaded. -N 22:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Delete - Ask user to source an image without watermark. This will remove the commercial connection. Ozdaren 00:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:G8 2006 leaders.jpg

Image:G8 2006 leaders.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Siqbal (notify | contribs).

Also: Image:G8brown.JPG. -N 03:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
all other g8russia.ru images have been deleted because the license is not free enough. It grants publishing rights only, not commercial or derivative use. — -N 21:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bahamas 8 138.jpg

Image:Bahamas 8 138.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by beebins (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic

Image:Miss_Universe_winning.jpg

Image:Miss_Universe_winning.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by And1987 (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary non-notable unfree image showing a Miss being crowned, used to illustrate the information that she was once crowned. Not much different of the cases throughly discussed in many nominations at June 18 and at a June 29 deletion review. Abu badali ^(talk) 23:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, as will surprise no one. :-) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unlike the Miss Teen garbage we deleted last time, Miss Universe is a big worldwide deal. -N 19:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dispute: How Miss Universe being a "big worldwide deal" implies that we need an image of a Miss being crowned to illustrate the text mentioning that she was crowned? How is this different from the images deleted in the IFDs cited above? --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because how else are you going to show what she looked like when she was crowned? This How else are you going to fully "get" the sour look on Zuleyka's face? How are you going to know in 50 years what the 2007 Miss Universe winner looked like, how she was styled, what sort of gown she wore, what the crown was like, what the backdrop for the pageant was like? This is the most important moment of her life and there are many facets to the image that cannot be accurately illustrated by words. Not only that, it is highly important for the Miss Universe 2007 article. PageantUpdater 21:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was discussed in the previous IFDs, where the decision was to delete the images. I understand you feel the decision was "clearly wrong"[2], but it doesn't mean I'm available to repeat the whole discussion again. --Abu badali ^(talk) 22:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets NFC 1 per consensus in previous IFD cited above. Any NFC 2 issues could possibly be fixed by reducing the image size as briefly suggested in that IFD. PageantUpdater 09:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dispute: What do you mean by "meets NFC 1 per consensus in previous IFD cited above"? In the ifds cited above (June 18 and June 29) all such images where deleted. --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Read the AFD - the consensus was clearly that it met NFC 1 even if the closing admin disagreed - more than a few editors suggested at the DR that consensus had not been followed. The DR hinged on the fact that the images failed NFC 2, but I believe you can fix that by greatly reducing the size and quality of the image as I think was suggested in this or maybe one of the other IFDs. PageantUpdater 02:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The whole issue with this idf and the previous ones is #8. --Abu badali ^(talk) 03:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I was getting my numbers mixed up... as I was trying to explain before there was general consensus as to that fact that it met NFC 8 (not 1), but the real issue was NFC 2. As I have explained numerous times, one way to radically reduce he commerical value of this image is to resize it and reduce the quality, as suggested in one of the IFDs. PageantUpdater 03:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS you are basing this IFD on #8. The IFD discussion specifically developed consensus that the image did meet NFC 8. 03:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

That's innacurate. The images were deleted (and the deletion were endorsed) exactly because the arguments that they passed #8 were ultimately considered unconvincing. --Abu badali ^(talk) 03:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The decision was clearly wrong. Anyone with a brain reading the IFD would come to the conclusion that there was consensus that crowning images pass NFC 8. Many people in the DR suggested that the wrong decision had been made: "Overturn I am a bit shocked of how the clear, reasonable consensus in keeping the image was not followed at all. A discussion was made on if the image would violate NFCC #8, and a wide consensus was found in support of the fact that this picture is significant for the beauty pageant article, probably even the only one to be really significant in it. ", "Overturn. One admin should not decide that an image fails #8. The fact that many more people disagreed with him in that did not matter, it seems", "If the image was used properly in the article, I believe it would meet NFCC #8". The decision of the closing admin did not match the discussion in the IFD, and should not override it. You have a brain, use it. PageantUpdater 04:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per above. Irreplaceable image a la Elian Gonzalez and we don't all agree (in fact most of us outside of the circle of IFD "regulars" don't agree) that words can convey everything. Hence the reason the editor above featured a devil on his/her userpage, along with text threatening other WP editors. Badagnani 18:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please keep your personal attacks off IFD. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - What personal attack? Badagnani was not making any attacks, just stating facts. PageantUpdater 02:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - By Wikipedia:No personal attacks, opinions about editors are not helpful in such discussions. --Abu badali ^(talk) 03:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - But where is the opinion? All I see is a recitation of facts here. Don't get on your high horse about nothing. PageantUpdater 04:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Abu Badali has a history of being uncivil in fair use discussions, which is a fact the arbcom has found true. Pointing out that he may be biased is not a personal attack. -N 03:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        That's completely untrue and inaccurate! I abhor your comment! It's false, and it's another attack on me. --Abu badali ^(talk) 04:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Abu sent me a message asking me to retract my statement. He is correct. The arbcom decision is merely proposed. And he also points out that it is not for "uncivil" behavior. He is correct. In fact the proposed decision merely contains 3 votes (6 is quorum) in favor of finding that many users "see" him as "incivil" (sorry for using the word uncivil) and also 4 votes in favor of finding that he is "sometimes viewed" as wikistalking. I apologize for my misstatements. -N 13:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Accepted. Let's consider avoid commenting about editors at all this time. --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Japanese_ethnic.PNG

Image:Japanese_ethnic.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Coojah (notify | contribs).

Collage of images from an sources. Abu badali ^(talk) 23:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Filipino_2.JPG

Image:Filipino_2.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Coojah (notify | contribs).

Collage of images from imprecise sources Abu badali ^(talk) 23:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Filipino_Ethnic.PNG

Image:Filipino_Ethnic.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Coojah (notify | contribs).

Collage of images from imprecise sources. Abu badali ^(talk) 23:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saab2000eastern.jpg

Image:Saab2000eastern.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Rawky123 (notify | contribs).

Taken from Airliners.net with copyright tag that does not match normal Airliners.net terms and does not include any indication that the photographer has released the image. — Hawaiian717 23:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Northeastenglandj41.jpg

Image:Northeastenglandj41.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Rawky123 (notify | contribs).

Taken from Airliners.net with copyright tag that does not match normal Airliners.net terms and does not include any indication that the photographer has released the image. — Hawaiian717 23:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Northeastendlandj41.jpg

Image:Northeastendlandj41.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Rawky123 (notify | contribs).

Taken from Airliners.net with copyright tag that does not match normal Airliners.net terms and does not include any indication that the photographer has released the image. — Hawaiian717 23:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]