Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 27
Appearance
December 27
[edit]- Ernest_Walker (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not used, not ensyclopedic, someone tried to PROD it earlier, but that process doesn't work for images. Sherool (talk) 01:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mercycrowdhury (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not used (the Holly Haynes article was deleted), also not entierly clear if she actualy released the image under the indicated licenses or if the uploader just grabbed it from her blog or website soemwhere. Sherool (talk) 02:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not used, low quality, watermarked and probably not ensyclopedic (article about subject has been deleted). Sherool (talk) 02:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Duncan inspired (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned image for a speedied article. Subject is either non-notable or a hoax. --Muchness (talk) 03:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Imzadi1979 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unused, redundant to Image:M-103.svg. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- There are actually quite a few of these; I'll list them here shortly. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- As promised:
- All by the same author as M-103.gif, all unused and redundant to SVG images in the form "Image:M-x.svg", where "x" is the number. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - No longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 17:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, redundant to Image:MA Route blank.svg. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopaedic joke image, used only for vandalism of the Jesus article. EALacey (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. This is an historical image. We should not be deleting FREE images. --Zcflint05 (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Any readers who doubt my description should simply view the image. It shows a crucified Christ with a dinosaur head superimposed over his face and a caption reading "EXTINCTION FOR OUR SINS." It's a joke, and not even an amusing one. EALacey (talk) 09:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. This is an historical image. We should not be deleting FREE images. --Zcflint05 (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nintendude (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unused, redundant to Image:M-16.svg. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 09:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - as above, no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- User:Clindhartsen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This image fails WP:NFCC policy #8 on "Significance" for this article. The image does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic (Fox News Channel). It is only used for decoration. Ilse@ 10:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Fox News Alerts, illiustrated by this graphic, are a trademark (figuratively, not literally) of the network. This image should stay. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The visual style of Fox News is discussed in the article. 65.96.121.145 (talk) 04:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- This is a discussion, not a vote. 65.96.121.145 (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- User:Clindhartsen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This image fails WP:NFCC policy #8 on "Significance" for this article. The image does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic (Fox News Channel). It is only used for decoration. Ilse@ 10:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- User:IvanKnight69 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This image fails WP:NFCC policy #8 on "Significance" for this article. The image does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic (Fox News Channel). It is only used for decoration. Ilse@ 10:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- I fail to see how this can be in the public domain. ViperSnake151 14:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- OR, LQ WinHunter (talk) 15:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Iamcuriousblue (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Fair-use cover art used as a general example, particular DVD is not discussed in the article. Jackaranga (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Jackaranga (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 02:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The reasoning behind the nom is very poor, in my opinion. Where, exactly, in Wikipedia policy does it say that an article on a genre, director, band, etc must discuss a specific work in order for it to be covered under "fair use"? I think fair use definitely covers specific works used as general examples. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 17:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Angelxyrah (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, probable Copyright violation — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cee-Hörnchen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Intothedarkness (notify | contribs). - uploaded by