Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 October 24

< October 23	October 25 >

October 24

Image:Blinki.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by HyperBandGeeks (notify | contribs). One of many Unencyclopedic images used privately within the page User:HyperBandGeeks (which is also up for deletion). Also nominating Image:Jay1.jpg, Image:Brandonwithisdrum.jpg, Image:Jay1234.jpg, Image:Brandonmarchingeditpic.jpg, and Image:Austinblinki123.gif for the same reasons. -- Daniel Olsen 00:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete delete delete delete delete delete. Back to myspace, goes this trash. -- Ned Scott 04:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ESC large ISS012 ISS012-E-21351.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Fosnez (notify | contribs). Duplicate of Image:Eclipse fromISS 2006-03-29.jpg except for the white part at the top. howch e ng {chat} 00:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My version is the original colour, (not Brightened as per the other example) and is a larger resolution. It should be kept and replace the other version of the file. Fosnez 04:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It appears to be the high-resolution uncropped image available upon request from NASA.[1] Fosnez, I wonder if you have considered uploading the high-resolution version to Commons?[2] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photo released by NASA under their licence, I am no expert in copyright, but if it can be uploaded then please do so. Fosnez 05:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ninjageorge.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by NinjaGeorge (notify | contribs). orphan -- Salad Days 02:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. Used on user page. howch e ng {chat} 23:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The user page of a perma-banned vandal. Ooookay. Salad Days 03:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now deleted. Sorry, didn't realize he had been permanently banned. howch e ng {chat} 01:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Portret na general Sharl djo Gol.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Hardouin (notify | contribs). False "fair use" claim: Clearly, there are portraits of De Gaulle in PD -- `'mikkanarxi 04:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:zichron_menachem_logo1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Dandin (notify | contribs). OB -- Dandin 05:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zichronmenachem_daycenter.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Dandin (notify | contribs). OB -- Dandin 05:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bae125jburford.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by H1523702 (notify | contribs). Non-commercial use only image, no plausable fair use claim can be made (it's just a photo of a plane) and the article already have several free images.- Sherool (talk) 05:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chevrolet-Biscayne-'64.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Diego440 (notify | contribs). Non-commercial use only image, a free licensed replacement can be made so no plausable fair use claim could be made per WP:FUC #1- Sherool (talk) 05:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bargate Southampton UK.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Prieni (notify | contribs). Non-commercial use only image. A free licensed replacement can be made so no plausable fair use defence per WP:FUC #1- Sherool (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Death's Head close-ups.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Aramgutang (notify | contribs). Non-commercial use only image, as I understand it's a fairly common moth so getting a free licensed replacement should be doable, hence no plausable fair use claim per WP:FUC #1- Sherool (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Acherontia atropos.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Aramgutang (notify | contribs). Non-commercial use only image, as I understand it's a fairly common moth so getting a free licensed replacement should be doable, hence no plausable fair use claim per WP:FUC #1- Sherool (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thomas More.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Neutrality (notify | contribs). This featured picture is available on Commons as Image:Hans Holbein d. J. 065.jpg. Listing here (instead of deleting under CSD I8) because the Commons image is using a different (lossy) file format. Please note that the Commons image has significantly higher resolution.- Conscious 07:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons version might be a higher resolution, but its actually significantly lower quality. Note for example the lack of detail above the eyebrow. -- Solipsist 08:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cbeebieslogo.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Robertsteadman (notify | contribs). Replaced by Image:CBeebies.png. -- London UK | talk 09:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Epguides tome.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by The Moneycruncher (notify | contribs). OR, and the licence looks bogus to me -- Mr WR 14:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LamontST 230x350.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Jamesedwardsmith (notify | contribs). Obviously not a screenshot, likely a press photo, not fair use. -- Arniep 14:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:B031007bc.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Glogger (notify | contribs). Usable for noncommercial purposes only. Peter O. (Talk) 14:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plumbingsurveillancelightvectorpainting.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Glogger (notify | contribs). No modification allowed. Peter O. (Talk) 14:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added GFDL-self (presumably the problem was with the licensing of the image; hopefully that solves the problem).Glogger 17:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. howch e ng {chat} 23:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Burshtinerrebbe.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Sunny123 (notify | contribs). Orphan, not used in any articles -- 86.134.112.18 14:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Sun (6-Sep-2006).jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Philip Stevens (notify | contribs). Unnecessary use of copyrighted image. -- Arniep 15:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oldcitymapaqsa.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Almaqdisi (notify | contribs). Says PD, but it's clearly not. Also violates FUC#1, and should not be used under a fair use claim. -- – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aqsacompund.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Almaqdisi (notify | contribs). Says PD, but it's clearly not. Also violates FUC#1, and should not be used under a fair use claim. -- – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PrivateEyecover1147-Blair-Cameron-face-transplant.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Rd232 (notify | contribs). Unnecessary use of copyrighted image. -- Arniep 15:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indy cover 22 july 2006.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Rnt20 (notify | contribs). Unnecessary use of copyrighted image. -- Arniep 15:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image was put on wikipedia because it was required as a source for the Foreign relations of the United States page, giving an example of foreign media coverage of US foreign policy. Rnt20 09:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. In order to use this image, you would have to discuss this specific issue of the newspaper and why it was significant. howch e ng {chat} 23:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:K790 front.jpg (talk | delete) Image:K790 back.jpg (talk | delete) Image:K790 side.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Soumyasch (notify | contribs). All fair use. Absolutely no way these qualify, free alternative(s) could easily be created - there must be hundreds of Wikipedians with this phone. -- Mark83 15:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rafcorrea.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Dalobuca (notify | contribs). Being sent an image in spam does not allow you to release it into the Public Domain, as has been asserted by the uploader as the image's origin. This is a copyrighted image with no fair-use rationale given. -- Seidenstud 17:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is the official campaign picture for Correa and it is on the ballots used for the election. It is fair to consider it public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.63.224.57 (talk • contribs)

How is it fair to consider someone's work public domain just because it is distributed? I could see fair-use, but no rationale has been given, and wouldn't that imply that there are no free alternatives available? But do we actually have any reason to beleive that there aren't any?? -Seidenstud 19:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyrighted image being released as public domain without permission. -Nv8200p talk 18:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DavisSchoolDistrict.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Kylejourdan (notify | contribs). Copyright violation -- 63.226.38.165 18:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have done this while logged in - the above submit was mine. This image is listed on the image page as copyright-free because it it a work of the Federal government, but it is actually the work of a county schoolboard, and as such is not copyright-free. The uploader has also had other problems with improperly using image that were then later removed (see edit history on Syracuse, Utah). Also the image really adds no real value to the Davis School District article, and so I commented it out so it's not currently visable. -- FishUtah 19:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]