Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 November 23

< November 22	November 24 >

Uploaded by Pietaster (notify | contribs). Fair use image; please delete to make room for PD image on Commons with same name.—Chowbok ☠ 01:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Is there a better way to go about this? I wasn't sure if I could use {{NCT}} since the image on Commons is different. —Chowbok ☠ 01:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Subtropical (notify | contribs). PD is probably not accurate, promotional copy, AB (0 edits + this upload) OR- Chris cheese whine 04:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Jimwsmith (notify | contribs). AB OR - appears to be someone's personal essay- Chris cheese whine 04:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by BanditNX (notify | contribs). Highly unencyclopedic. Basically just a vandalized version of Mansfield emblem.png.—Czj 06:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to have been uploaded for vandalism. shotwell 04:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, quite apart from the copyright question, it's an unnecessary duplicate of Image:Thorpe.backstroke.jpg. —An gr 09:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. First of all, it is not a copy of Image:Thorpe.backstroke.jpg, but rather a lossless PNG version (meaning it can be edited, if need be, without a loss of quality) and has been cropped so it doesn't include that single-pixel black border. However, I see now that Image:Thorpe.backstroke.jpg is in possible copyvio so there is no reason to keep either. My apologies for uploading a copyvio image - please feel free to delete. --Anthony5429 04:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Eyehawk78 (notify | contribs). Orphanded, not ensyclopedic (some Runescape "clan" banner I think) and copyvio (claims PD, but include copyrighted works)- Sherool (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by StANDby007 (notify | contribs). Nonsense original research map of the Ottoman Empire. Khoi khoi 19:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Mudel (notify | contribs). Derivative work of previously deleted photo; uploader ran original through Photoshop filter and claims it as orginal work.—Chowbok ☠ 23:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The uploader is simply lying. As if the Photoshopping weren't obvious enough, the Corbis watermark certainly is. Postdlf 18:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Shawnc 04:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]