Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop/Archive/Apr 2016

Resolved

Convert Sacramento Kings logo to .SVG

Resolved

– FOX 52 (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Sacramento Kings
Request: I'm requesting that File:SacramentoKings.png be converted to an .SVG file. -- Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

Done: File:SacramentoKings.svg -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 07:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

North Korean stop sign

Resolved

– FOX 52 (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file

Article(s)

Request: Please create the Korean text on the sign, as seen in these two photos. [1] & [2]. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Partially done: I only added the Hangul "섯" by text element instead of replicating the exact glyph shape as shown in the photos by path element. You may keep asking others to do this or I may do it myself when I have more time. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that is really close actually. If you want to try in the future to make it better or if someone else wants to make a try that is ice, but I'm not complaining :) Fry1989 ^eh? 16:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroshima Flower Festival, try 2, going on now

Resolved

– Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Hiroshima Flower Festival
Request: please create a new, undated png or svg, by removing the date and centering the hiragana text "ひろしま" ("Hiroshima") inside the red parallelogram… The current logo can be seen at the official website for comparison. Please someone give this a shot, the event is going on now.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s): Done as PNG. SiBr₄ (talk) 08:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]; Thank you so much, it's perfect, and timely!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gender Symbol

Resolved

– FOX 52 (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol for Gender

Article(s): Gender

Request: Link the circles. As is, one circle is in front and the other behind. Have blue go under red at one overlap point. and over it at the other overlap point, so the circles appear, linked like links in a chain. -- Chrisrus (talk) 02:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done: And clean up of Inkscape garbage codes. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 17:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mr. Sameboat

66th Infantry Divisional flash

Resolved

– FOX 52 (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vector

Article(s)

66th Division (United Kingdom)

Request

A request for one of our talented graphics artists to create a vector version of the 66th Divisional flash, as seen here. While the website may or may not be a RS, the image matches the description as seen in the following RS: Swinton, Twenty Years After: The Battlefields of 1914-18; Then and Now, Volume 2, p. 1355 — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnigmaMcmxc (talk • contribs) 23:24, 11 April 2016

Graphist opinion(s)

Like this? SiBr₄ (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks perfect, thank you!EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request to have divisional flash amended

Resolved

– FOX 52 (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current image in need of amending
Original, for reference

Article(s): 61st Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

Request

The current vector of the divisional flash includes dots around the outside, per the version on the Imperial War Museum. However, as can be seen on the original uploaded version (above) and the following variants on the IWM (here and here) the dots are not present. I believe them to be a cutting guideline (as evidenced here). Can the above vector be amended to remove them? Kind regards, EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mliu92: pinging the original artist.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done SiBr₄ (talk) 14:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you every much, EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]