Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Xiaxue/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Strong consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Very substandard BLP. Mostly proseline. About a quarter of the article by weight is an inflated 'controversy' section that I'm of half a mind to take to WP:BLPN, let alone permit the article to be considered a GA. Vaticidalprophet 15:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Second this. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Third. Does not hold up as a GA. Not sure what was the standards back then, but it seems that the last GA was briefly evaluated compared to the previous one. – robertsky (talk) 07:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delist, per @Robertsky and @Dawkin Verbier.
- Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 04:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.