Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tsugaru clan/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Much of this article is uncited, and the lede is too short to summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom comments. The unsourced information is too much. Also some issues with MOS:OVERLINK. seefooddiet (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- seefooddiet, your !vote has no meaning. You're supposed to give the reassessment time to give traction. 750h+ 09:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- This article definitely needs some love and an update, but overlinking is a trivial and easily fixed complaint. I found a mere two instances of it being broken and simply fixed them (hatamoto is still linked twice, but it's relevant in both places and in greatly spaced sections, so allowed by the OL rules). SnowFire (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- It may be good to list up most uncited areas. Cutting down on unsupportable claims and sticking references from jawiki, along with finding sources in Japanese may work? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- This article definitely needs some love and an update, but overlinking is a trivial and easily fixed complaint. I found a mere two instances of it being broken and simply fixed them (hatamoto is still linked twice, but it's relevant in both places and in greatly spaced sections, so allowed by the OL rules). SnowFire (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.