Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trimaran Capital Partners/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: No action. Article renominated at GAN. Geometry guy 21:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I came to this article thinking it could be brought up to GA quality given the starting place. The article was failed on the basis of references. However, the article is highly referenced. After the initial review, I made an effort to address particular issues suggested by the reviewer. At this point, every statement that could potentially be challenged is referenced/sourced and nearly all of the information in the article was cited as well. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 11:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- It does look like all of the review points were addressed. I suggest an immediate renomination at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- It looks like you have been a victim of a "bean counting" review. That said, sentences such as "The acquisition of Argosy marked an aggressive push by CIBC into the U.S. investment banking business." do require inline citation of some sort. Your best option is to renominate at GAN. I propose to close this reassessment shortly on that basis, if no one else does so before I do. Geometry guy 20:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is already listed on WP:GAN. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 20:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)