Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: kept It appears that after work by editors involved in the discussion below, all of the sourcing issues have been resolved. No other problems are obvious so the article should maintain its status. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
I am putting this article up at GAR due to its sourcing issues. I find that some of the references used in the article are unreliable, like GameSniped or Zelda Universe. Another issue the article has is original research as there is a section dedicated to "Technical issues" along with no citations in said section for that matter. GamerPro64 19:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Looking at the article the technical issues section was added wholesale last August (almost five years after it became a good article). With that issue its probably best simply to remove the entire section since there never were any sources for it.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- I removed the section in question so that issue should be fixed. No idea about the whether the sources mentioned are good or not though.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 03:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The issue has been rectified, so the article remains a GA. ★★RetroLord★★ 14:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- I removed the section in question so that issue should be fixed. No idea about the whether the sources mentioned are good or not though.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 03:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Looking at the article the technical issues section was added wholesale last August (almost five years after it became a good article). With that issue its probably best simply to remove the entire section since there never were any sources for it.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Leaning towards delist - Game Sniped (which is an auction site and not a RS) is still being used (criterion 2b). That needs to be replaced. Also, there's no info on the how many units of the game have been sold and how much revenue the game has generated (criterion 3a).--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Added the sales (didn't notice their absence), but am still struggling with an RS for the special GBA, the best ones so far are Game Sniped and a Flickr picture. igordebraga ≠ 02:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- The one Game Sniped ref and its associated info re: the Stars Store is unverifiable and should be scrapped. I looked all over—it isn't crucial to the article at all, if it's even true. Here's another source for the golden tickets. Japan sales src. czar · · 04:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, changed with what you suggested. Hope now the GAR can be closed with the article still Good. igordebraga ≠ 14:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.