Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Last Waltz/1
Appearance
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: No action. It is possible that this article is weak on inline citation, but no such case has been made per the GA criteria. If anyone wishes to make such a case a new reassessment can be opened. Geometry guy 19:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
There are entire sections without a single citation. Definetley not a good, or even decent article.BillyJack193 (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is the laziest nomination I've seen in a while. The second sentence wasn't even proof-read before hitting save. Note that synopses do not need inline citations for their descriptions, as the (primary) source is obvious. I agree that other sections may be short on citation, but you should at least make the effort to point to some claims in the article which require inline citation per the GA criteria.
- Anyway, we will do our best at GAR to respond to your nomination. Did you notify any active editors who might be able to help? Geometry guy 20:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)