Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sugar/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues seem fixed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Many sections are underdeveloped, such as most of the level 3 headings in "Health effects", "Consumption" and "Society and culture". There is also some uncited text. Z1720 (talk) 22:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be very little wrong with this article really. The supposedly underdeveloped subsections within 'Health', for example, are very minor sub-aspects of the topic, i.e.
- Sugar
- Health effects
- Obesity and metabolic syndrome --- main article Diet and obesity#Sugar consumption - it seems entirely apposite that this subsubsection is a brief paragraph.
- Health effects
- Sugar
- There seems to be very little wrong with this article really. The supposedly underdeveloped subsections within 'Health', for example, are very minor sub-aspects of the topic, i.e.
- As for uncited text, it's only a few items within lists, all of which are at least partially covered by sources at the heads of those lists. This does seem to be an extremely thin ground for GAR; there are GAs with order-of-magnitude worse problems than this one. I've removed or cited all the uncited claims that I found. I believe the article is now in a good state. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.