Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sivaji (film)/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Kept, all the notes were fulfilled by the main editor.--Retrohead (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed this article for GA reassessment because it was badly damaged by edit wars, content deletion and info not up-to-date (possibility of dead links). I want to therefore improve it. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 13:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Kailash29792
Lead
  • Empty the lead of ref's as per WP:LEAD. But the same content must exist in the body with ref's.

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Let the most notable cast members stay in the lead.

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do some general copyediting, or at least remove whatever sounds informal, colloquial, figurative or idiomatic.

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot
  • Seems fine, a few edits by a GOCE member should make it look best.
Cast
  • Let the most notable members stay, while minor ones may also, if there is any source to prove their inclusion.

 Done Most notable members staying. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production
  • Does this image satisfy WP:NFCC? I don't think so, and it should be uploaded through Commons with permission from the image's owner, who is The Hindu!

 Done Removed the image. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Release
  • This section needs serious copyediting, and "bagged" is not formal. Also, mention the Censor Board by its full name - the Central Board of Film Certification.

 Done Lstanley1979 has done a c/e on this section. CBFC expanded to Central Board of Film Certification. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 07:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Box office
  • Information on the film's release can be shifted to "release".

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • "It grossed $101,779 in its full run in South Africa." - source?

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3D conversion
  • This section can be renamed to "3D re-release".

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response
  • Many review sites are not referred to here by name, when they should be.

 Done named review sites. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades
  • Source the entire section.

 Done sourced. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular Culture
  • Decapitalise "Popular Culture", and expand upon the content.

 Done removed the section. Placed it in my sandbox. Will expand upon the content when I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack
  • This section better come after "Production" and before "Release".

 Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the other mishaps in the article are glaring and explicit enough for you to correct. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Some minor points:

  • I suggest to merge the lead into three paragraphs.
  • "Shankar was paid a record salary of 30 million for this project". In the sentence, you do not need to have space after {{INR}} and so with the succeeding one.
  • I suggest to tweak one of the sentences that have "record salary" as both look almost same thing.
  • In the casting section, Nayantara and Asin need to be linked.
  • I suggest to shift the sentence from the sub-section "Visual effects". The sub-section is not needed when it has only one sentence.
  • The full stop (.) is missing in the first sentence of Release section.
  • "The kanjira is a South Indian frame drum, is an instrument of the tambourine family." does not look sound to me. --FrankBoy (Buzz) 12:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done All of the above comments have been resolved. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 13:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]