Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ron Paul/2
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review
- Result: Delisted for insufficient coverage and a lack of effort to address such concerns SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This article seems rather un-comprehensive of Paul's biography and career. Take for example the "Later congressional career (1997–2013)" section. For a man who was very active in congress for those 16 years, the "tenure" subsection there is incredibly short. Yes, many things are spun-off into their own articles (such as his political positions and legislation sponsored), so those things can be forgiven for brevity here. But even when that is considered, the other sections of the article (those without spun-off articles) are too bare for this to feel right as a good article, let alone an "A-Class" good article. SecretName101 (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe this was up-to-snuff by Wikipedia standards back in 2007, when it was approved. But, it does not appear to meet our current standards. SecretName101 (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)