Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Preston railway station/1
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted (not kept, sorry). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Lots of missing citations, poor layout, giant tables in the body, wicked excessive images, a far too detailed accidents section that fails to use any discretion... this is not a GA in its present state and is actually painful to try and read with all the clutter. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell was questioning the GA status of this article in 2012! Delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't even make it to the talk page before deciding this was a clear GAR candidate, that just makes it even worse! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delist. Unsourced paragraphs and lists are a real problem. Also has a few maintenance tags that are several years old. Phlsph7 (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.