Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Norman Finkelstein/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
A controversial figure; difficult to write a GA about. Article has not been maintained to standards since 2007:
- The lead dedicates no time to his views or academic work, but an entire paragraph to two incidents in 2007/2008
- Contains overly long quotes throughout the article. Many from Finkelstein himself, giving me some NPOV concerns
- One cn tag.
- Too many external links. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yep, not great. There are a huge number of quotes sourced directly to Finkelstein himself, making them primary with no real sense of the appropriate weight for the extracts established in secondary sources. A large volume of material is self-published on his personal website. To produce a B-class article, let alone a GA status article, this page would basically need to be half-scrapped and rewritten from scratch. Like many GAs listed in 2007, it is not worthy of the status. Definitely one for delisting. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.