Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mountain of Madness/1

Mountain of Madness

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: No action. The article has been improved and there is no longer a strong case for delisting. However, it still has weaknesses and needs further improvement. Geometry guy 19:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article is "good" in my eyes. It needs more content, and one section is entirely uncited. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, the unsourced cultural references section was slipped in there by some IP. It is rather low compared to the newer Simpson episode GAs, I'll see what I can do. (By the way, you could have just mentioned this on the talk page). -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 15:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. We'll try to handle it as best we can at GAR, and hopefully help you to improve the article. Geometry guy 21:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I also think expansion is needed to achieve GA here. A single secondary source and less than one line of reception does not reach "broadness of coverage" for an internationally syndicated programme. Hopefully it can be expanded during the GAR.Yob Mod 16:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the article a bit now with all the information I could find on Google and NewsBank. TheLeft orium 14:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has improved. Does anyone want to press the case for delisting? Geometry guy 19:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll have some time to add more to the article tomorrow. I'll also listen to the commentary again (although if memory serves, it doesn't have much). -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - And done. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 16:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article would benefit from better references. However, the current citations meet GA standards. Majoreditor (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I added a (rather bland) sentence on the reception to the lead. I encourage content experts to improve on my effort! Geometry guy 20:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]