Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Miami, Florida/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch •
- This article was nominated for good article reassessment to determine whether or not it met the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. The article was delisted. Please see the archived discussion for further information. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 03:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
As Chicago strives to regain its WP:GA status, WP:CHICAGO is looking at other comparable municipalities to strive toward. Unfortunately, this is not what I believe it should be striving toward. The WP:LEAD is more than the max four paragraphs and large blocks of text are uncited. I do not consider this article any better than Chicago, which was duly delisted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 17:58, 29 February 2008
- As there's no one opposing this delisting, it need not have been brought to reassessment. Any editor is welcome to delist an article if they feel (in good faith) that it does not meet the good article criteria. --jwandersTalk 01:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've had a look at the article and would also be happy for you to delist this article according to the delisting guidelines. This discussion can then be closed. Geometry guy 22:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)