Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hurricane Ivan/1
Appearance
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch •
- Result: No action. Geometry guy 23:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
This article, despite reaching A class in the past, was strewn with grammar problems, red links, no consistent reference format when I found it on February 1. While it has improved since then due to the efforts of a couple editors, I'm not quite certain we've improved it enough to meet GA standards nowadays. Any comments pro or con GA status for this article would be appreciated. If it no longer meets standards, please comment as to what needs to be fixed, in your view. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The article is in much better shape than a fortnight ago. However, it needs additional copyediting. Majoreditor (talk) 04:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Have done additional copyediting to the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. A cursory glance reveals some issues:
- MoS concerns: Full stops are used for image captions despite caption not being a full sentence. There are also issues with sandwiching of images and tables.
- Reference concern: Retirement section needs to be sourced.
- Broadness concern: impact on areas such as Venezuela, Cayman Islands, Jamaica and others is apparently substantial enough to warrant headers, but these areas do not receive coverage in “Aftermath” section.
- ЭLСОВВОLД talk 00:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)