Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Horcrux/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch •
- Result: Delist: Actionable concerns (particularly in regards to WP:WAF compliance) have not been addressed in over one month's time at GAR. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 00:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Too much in-universe text for a GA article. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 19:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Opinion - Criteria 1(b): I don't think the article is written in the style suggested in WP:WAF Some sections are written from an in universe style, most notably the sections on the individual horcruxes. There are also instances of writing in a less than encyclopaedic manner (example "Because snake senses are different, being able to sense heat and movement in a way humans can't").
- Criteria 2(b): Some of the sources used in the article are not reliable and should not be used to verify information, specifically fansites and broadcasts such as The Harry Potter Lexicon and Pottercast
- Criteria 3(a):I do not think that major aspects of the topic are dealt with, there is detailed coverage of the individual horcruxes but little coverage of the horcruxes as a whole. Real world development and reception ahould be important factors in an article about a fictional concept but they are almost entirely absent. Guest9999 (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Fails to meet WP:WAF, needs a more out of universe perspetive. Tarret talk 13:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delist, it also has several WP:MOS issues (ref format, overlinking, etc).--Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 17:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delist. Suitable for the Harry Potter Wiki, but not for Wikipedia and GA status. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 20:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)