Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Holden Commodore/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
This 2007 listing contains significant uncited material near the start and end of the body, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b); it is also overloaded by images (and tagged accordingly) but that is not part of the GA criteria. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think that the article is quite sufficient and don't think it should be removed, but hey, I might be wrong.
- Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well it should be. Many, many dead/unreliable links. The History section is nearly entirely unsourced. However, I did notice that the generation sections (eg #VS (1995–1997)) were nearly fully sourced (however, are the sources reliable? No. Arotparaarms, could you read the GA criteria please? I realised you randomly listed Chevrolet Volt (first generation) as a GA when I nominated it without even taking a look. Please take some time. 750h+ (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.