Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Group 5 element/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues have been resolved. 141Pr -\contribs/- 16:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
The article has uncited prose, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 13:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've started outlining the work that needs to be done with citation needed tags, moved a reference and commented out some info. I didn't see the GA concerns until this reassessment appeared under the GAR listings; for whatever reason it's listed under physics and not chemistry and as such doesn't appear on the Chemistry article alerts. Corrections should be straightforward as a lot of the info is going to come from the main article pages (Vanadium, Niobium, Tantalum, Dubnium) and should already be cited there. Reconrabbit 16:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it looks like a lot of the information that should be in the parent articles (several of which like Vanadium compounds appeared to be copied over in part) is not there. I'll still work on this though. May be useful in maintaining quality of the parents (which would otherwise be subject to similar reassessments). Reconrabbit 19:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Found a source that at least mentions the configuration. Other obvious issues have been addressed - all that seems missing is a page number for "Inorganic Chemistry" as it's a fairly large reference work and I added the citation based on a preview/ use in another article. Reconrabbit 15:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720, it was annoying finding where in that textbook the information on oxyhalides was, but I found it. Everything that seemed clearly missing references has been addressed from where I can see it. Reconrabbit 00:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Citation concerns have been resolved. No other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720, it was annoying finding where in that textbook the information on oxyhalides was, but I found it. Everything that seemed clearly missing references has been addressed from where I can see it. Reconrabbit 00:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Found a source that at least mentions the configuration. Other obvious issues have been addressed - all that seems missing is a page number for "Inorganic Chemistry" as it's a fairly large reference work and I added the citation based on a preview/ use in another article. Reconrabbit 15:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it looks like a lot of the information that should be in the parent articles (several of which like Vanadium compounds appeared to be copied over in part) is not there. I'll still work on this though. May be useful in maintaining quality of the parents (which would otherwise be subject to similar reassessments). Reconrabbit 19:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.