Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Bridgewater Associates/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Keep Outstanding issues addressed AIRcorn (talk) 02:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
I passed this article during a GA review in December. I spot checked about a dozen of its sources, and it came up OK. Subsequently, another editor has tagged the article with verifiability problems on other sources. Given that the tags have not been addressed since December, I am sending this article to a community GAR. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 01:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Have the major contributors been notified of this (you can use {{subst:GARMessage|''ArticleName''|page=''n''}}). Note that you can also conduct an individual reassessment on the articles talk page. AIRcorn (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. Actually, I removed the GAR template on that article (thinking a bot would remove the GAR on this page). The article's main contributor has been working on the issues since I put a notice on the article's talk page and on his talk page. AstroCog (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Issues have been fixed by main contributor to article.AstroCog (talk) 02:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. Actually, I removed the GAR template on that article (thinking a bot would remove the GAR on this page). The article's main contributor has been working on the issues since I put a notice on the article's talk page and on his talk page. AstroCog (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)