Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Aztec cuisine/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted per lack of effort to address below concerns after nearly 2 months Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Upon reading this 2008 promotion, this article has not been maintained to its expected standards. First of all, the lede is only a single sentence which is too short for an article such as this, so therefore it does not summarise it properly, failing criteria 1b. I may need someone else to see if the prose is still okay. I believe it also fails criteria 2a, 2b and 2c for the following reasons: citations are presented poorly (excluding most of the notes) and do not meet the guidelines, and ref no. 17 is clearly original research, therefore completely unreliable. There are a number of "citation needed" tags (six of them) littered throughout the article, so I feel like this article no longer meets the criteria. Did I mention that some paragraphs don't even have citations at all, even if they aren't tagged? Burklemore1 (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)