Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Awesome Kong/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. 48JCL TALK 21:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2010 promotion has 13 citation needed tags, as well as other untagged statements lacking citations. Spinixster (trout me!) 07:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is just too much uncited here to retain as a GA. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.