Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Audi S and RS models/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. feminist (talk) 16:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
The article for the “good article” nomination lacks sources, needs minor corrections, correction of design in links and other corrections. I propose to remove the nomination "good article"--Anton V. (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- 5 days passed, no one expressed objections, and there were no improvements in the article. The nomination is removed.--Anton V. (talk) 17:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Anton V.: The GAR was not properly closed, and 5 days is way too short for adequate discussion and improvement of the article. Please follow the instructions on Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/guidelines to close this reassessment. feminist (talk) 02:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not 5 days, but about a month since the beginning of the discussion. No one objected. I nominated the article, and I am the main editor. For this I use community reassessment.--Anton V. (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- My problem is that procedures at WP:GAR were not followed properly. Now, these are common mistakes, so just remember to perform the close correctly next time. feminist (talk) 16:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not 5 days, but about a month since the beginning of the discussion. No one objected. I nominated the article, and I am the main editor. For this I use community reassessment.--Anton V. (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Anton V.: The GAR was not properly closed, and 5 days is way too short for adequate discussion and improvement of the article. Please follow the instructions on Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/guidelines to close this reassessment. feminist (talk) 02:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- 5 days passed, no one expressed objections, and there were no improvements in the article. The nomination is removed.--Anton V. (talk) 17:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)