Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Annika Sörenstam/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
This page needs a tremendous amount of work. 13 citation needed tags. The "Professional wins" section is completely uncited. Schierbecker (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi,
- All results are here
- Source:
- I placed the ref in the Professional wins section.
- Ryder Cup controversy source also in place.
- Regards, EEJB (talk) 11:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[svara]
- ^ "Spelare, Annika Sörenstam, Samtliga tävlingsresultat i kronologisk ordning" [Player, Annika Sörenstam, All tournament results in chronological order] (in Swedish). Swedish Golf Federation and Golf Data AB. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
- EEJB (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- User:EEJB, do you think this is worth saving? I have limited time, but I can lend a hand in improving. Schierbecker (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks like the nominator's concerns have been mostly addressed. Just about everything looks cited. I see only one cn tag left. If it can't be addressed, worst case that sentence could just be removed. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- This article is coming along, but the Professional wins, Major championships and LPGA Tour record sections are almost completely uncited. Schierbecker (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- The "Professional wins" section already has two citations that cover the whole section. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- This article is coming along, but the Professional wins, Major championships and LPGA Tour record sections are almost completely uncited. Schierbecker (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, Sources put in place. Hope it's enough. Regards, EEJB (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.