Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2011 Super Outbreak/1

2011 Super Outbreak

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisting per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article has suffered over the last decade plus from WP:HALFLIFE and a lack of updates. Never fully fleshed out to begin with, the article's aftermath section was never properly expanded even after a notice was put up about it. Over the years there have been many journal articles published about the event, of which only one has been incorporated. There is an immense amount of work required to get this article up to par. At present there is no need for a thorough review of the article until published journals (primarily from the AMS) are incorporated and the aftermath section is written. If that is done I am open to continuing with a further review to ensure the article is up to GA standards. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 20:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a really good idea. There are some other weather articles that could use that as well. ChessEric 00:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChessEric, if you know of any off the top of your head, please feel free to nominate them at GAR. There's a script at the top of the GAR page which makes the whole process much easier. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. ChessEric 01:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused on how to do it though. Could you show me? ChessEric 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example, I think the February 2009 North American storm complex article needs a GAR. How do I request one? ChessEric 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you install the User:SD0001/GAR-helper script, there should be an option for "GAR" in the menu where you normally find the "Move" button, ChessEric. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 07:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn’t you just do it instead of wasting time here lol. United States Man (talk) 01:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@United States Man: I'm focused on other articles and don't want to spend the time researching and writing this one. I'm happy to guide and help others who are able to put forth the effort on this one though. I've brought it up multiple times over the years and it's just time for this process to begin. If an article isn't up to standards it shouldn't be displayed as such. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 02:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclonebiskit, do you mind providing links to the journal articles you refer to? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AirshipJungleman29: Of course, links are below. These are the main journals that are easy to find through the American Meteorological Society. There are many other journal articles that are not primarily focused on the outbreak but have information pertaining to it. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.