Wikipedia:GLAM/University of Toronto Libraries/Resources/MOS checklist
Appearance
Manual of Style (MoS) |
---|
This MOS checklist is adapted from the 27 Sep 2021 version of Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the style manual for all English Wikipedia articles.
Here, you will find a summary list of guidelines on common editing features. For detailed guidelines, please use the sidebar (on the right) and provided links to reference the appropriate page in full.
Rules of thumb
[edit]- Be clear, precise, and concise. Avoid jargon and vague phrasing. When technical terms are unavoidable, at least explain them with sources.
- Maintain an impartial and instructional tone, and avoid the use of editorial or persuasive voice.
- Aim for stylistic consistency within each article.
- When reproducing names, titles of works, or quotes, preserve original stylistic conventions.
- Sometimes, more than one style is considered acceptable in an article. In such cases, please do not change an article from one style to another "unless there is some substantial reason for the change."[1]
Checklists
[edit]What | How | Example |
---|---|---|
Titles and headings (MOS:AT) | Use sentence case. Capitalise only the first letter and all proper names. | "Funding of UNESCO projects" instead of "Funding of UNESCO Projects" |
For English-language works (books, films, poems, songs, etc.), or the English-language portions of those titles, use title case. | nîpawistamâsowin: We Will Stand Up | |
Citation placement (MOS:PF) | Cite after punctuation. If multiple sentences use the same source, cite after the final consecutive sentence. | Flightless birds have a reduced keel,[10] and they also have smaller wing bones than flying birds of similar size.[11][12] |
Spelling (MOS:ARTCON) | Write titles/quotes as given in the source. For proper names, use the subject's own spelling. |
|
Overall, keep spelling consistent within the same article. | ||
Quotes (MOS:QUOTE; MOS:QUOTEPOV) | Use quotes only when they add value beyond what can be paraphrased. Do not overuse. | The women of high Chinese society also followed these codified practices, and used silk in their garments alongside the addition of countless decorative motifs.[4] A 17th century work, Jin Ping Mei, gives a description of one such motif:
|
Quotes may be used, with attribution, to present emotive opinions that cannot be expressed in Wikipedia's instructional voice. Concise opinions can be reported directly without quotes. Opinional quote use does not apply to cultural norms, which should not be presented as opinional. |
| |
If adding a foreign language quote, ideally supply a modern translation. | ||
Date and time (MOS:DATE) | Keep date format consistent through the article. | On 24 October 2018, [...] In June 2020, [...] Between May and July 2021, [...]. |
Use standardised references to time, if possible. Vague and/or relative references can vary across contexts and become outdated. |
|
What | How | Example |
---|---|---|
Tone (MOS:NOTE | Keep the tone impartial and instructional. Avoid phrases that "break the fourth wall" or insert the editor's personal judgment. | Avoid rhetorical questions, "note that", "obviously", "awesome", "unbelievable", etc. |
Tense (MOS:TENSE) | Write articles in the present tense. Avoid past tense except for past events, subjects that are dead or no longer meaningfully exist, or periodicals and similar written material that are no longer being produced. |
|
Gender (MOS:GNL; MOS:GID) | Make generic references gender-neutral. This does not apply to situations where gender-neutral language will confuse the reader. |
|
For specific references, use pronouns that reflect the subject's most recent ID. | Elliot Page is a Canadian actor and producer. He has received various accolades. | |
Group/cultural identity (MOS:ID) | Be specific and avoid vague, stereotyping ID |
|
Where there is a discrepancy between a group's preferred term and a reliable source, use what is most commonly used by reliable sources when this is clear. Use the preferred term when this is unclear. | ||
Words to watch (MOS:WTW) | Use sources and factual statements to demonstrate a subject's importance. There is no need to rely on value-laden words (see below). |
|
Avoid "peacock terms", or positively loaded words that promote the subject of an article. Use sources and factual statements to demonstrate a subject's importance. | iconic, visionary, innovative, revolutionary, virtuoso | |
Avoid negatively loaded labels unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject. In the latter case, attribute the use of the label and establish context for any formal use of the term. | cult, fundamentalist, heretic, neo-Nazi, -gate, pseudo- | |
Avoid weasel words which vaguely dress a statement with authority, without basis. Some such statements may be acceptable in the lead section of an article (which summarises content in the body of the article) when they accurately represent the overall opinions of reliable sources. | some people say, many scholars state, it is considered, experts declare, it is widely thought, scientists claim | |
Avoid persuasive writing. The editor should not impose an interpretation of a story. | actually, indeed, tragically, arguably, interestingly, it should be noted | |
Repetition is not a problem. Avoid distorting meaning with synonyms in an attempt to avoid repeating words. |
|
Notes
[edit]- ^ See ArbCom decisions in June 2005, November 2005, and 2006.