Wikipedia:GLAM/New Zealand Wikipedian at Large/Melbourne
Notes from Melbourne visit, November 2018
[edit]Links
[edit]Wikipedia NZ
[edit]The Community Capacity exercise was interesting in highlighting not just what we're doing OK in (social media, press) but areas we hadn't even thought about building capacity in (bots, OTRS – are there any OTRS volunteers in NZ?). Our "group" is embryonic, but this will be a useful tool in identifying where we can improve, and where we lack robustness (dependent on just one person).
- It would be easy enough to create a press kit with a FAQ, contact names and details, links to stories, some CC media photos.
- We need to encourage a diverse range of interviewees in media coverage, and give joint interviews (not just me all the time!)
- NZ needs a representative in the Wikimedia Cuteness Association to attend international events.
- As of September 2017, there were 270 active editors at a NZ IP address (five or more edits a month in English Wikipedia). Australia has 1100 (not as many per capita as NZ)
- Australia does Wikiclubs through libraries: would they work better at universities? Keen procrastinating young people, a club/society structure already, rooms and wifi easily available, plus access to experts and references. Maybe try to launch one at VUW in the new year?
Draft 1-year plan for Wikipedia Aotearoa (Wikimedia NZ?), when the usergroup is formed:
- Brainstorm a baseline capacity survey and add it to the Community Capacity Map, identifying what skills are missing and what training could be possible from AU or the WMF
- Engaging with Māori to contribute to a toolkit of recommendations for working with tangata whenua on Wikimedia projects (see below), to share with Australia and the Wikimedia Foundation
- Carry out a banner-based survey of NZ editors using Central Notice, which can send results to Google Forms, asking what NZers want to work on, what tools or contacts are they missing etc.
- Organise a small Wikiconference ("hobbit-sized"), a one-day free central event with one structured and one "unconference" stream; perhaps somewhere nice like Martinborough. Short and sweet, not for muggles.
Indigenous Culture Toolkit
[edit]Practices and sensibilities around indigenous people is going to be a priority for the Year of Indigenous Languages. An educational resource/guide that talks about what works, what doesn't. AU/NZ cautions and case studies. I was pretty frank about what would be required from any project wanting to work with Māori.
- See Whose Knowledge?
- See origin of the [of Tijuana]; originally a Kumeyaay word, but no citation available. The Kumeyaay want this to be known, but can't supply a source – another lesson on the importance of documenting sources (see the PCAP project, and Asaf's talk on what Wikipedia can learn from the women's movement).
General
[edit]- The importance of sharing logins in case a critically-important person is hit by a bus.
- Running Commons events is great for beginners, but Commons doesn't teach them any Wikipedia editing – a gap.
- In theory, a User page on Meta propagates across all wikis; in practice, project interlinking breaks all the links.
- Use Wikipedia: Plain and Simple (WP:PANDS) with newbies.
- Be seen to be working outside the big cities.
- WMF may be willing to up the number of scholarships to an event held in Australasia if it overcomes the "chilling effect" of distances and increases equity.
- Rewards for promising and prolific newbies: the custom can of condensed milk (literally) in Ukranian WP, the "First Harvest" award in Israeli WP.
- Thank someone every day, even for creating an article years ago.
- ESEAP is in 2020.
- Possible project: training materials for Pattypan. Work with author and look for WMF support.
- Lexeme system, based on Wikidata, is going to revitalise Wiktionary
- Structured data on Commons: allows descriptions from multiple cultural perspectives and languages; similar to haw the PCAP project is adding descriptions to Auckland Museum objects.
- "Wikipedia is a middle-class hobby!"