Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/December 2009

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rosey and The Hurricane

[edit]
Main contributors: ThinkBlue, NiciVampireHeart and Nikki311

We are nominating the topic Rosey and The Hurricane as a Good Topic. Rosey and The Hurricane was a professional wrestling tag team in WWE, comprised of Gregory Helms (aka The Hurricane), Matt Anoa'i (aka Rosey), and their manager Stacy Keibler (aka Super Stacy). All four articles in the topic are of Good article status. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) and ♥NiciVampireHeart20:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invincible class battlecruisers

[edit]

I am nominating the Invincible class battlecruisers for GT because I believe that it meets the criteria. All four articles are at GA and they share a common layout and navbox.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturmvogel 66 (talkcontribs)

River martin

[edit]

Having succeeded with a genus FT previously, an entire subfamily this time, albeit with just two members. I'm aiming for GT, and the three articles are all at GA. The articles ahave the same layout and a navbox. Inevitably, there's a certain amount of overlap, but I've tried to incorporate some different bits into each article. Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why the top left corner isn't working? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? rst20xx (talk) 13:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The bit that should read "edit-topic discussion-book" is just showing redlinked "book" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's how it should be, you can't edit or discuss a topic until it's promoted, but you can create the book for it - rst20xx (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks, I didn't notice that last time around Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the book link wouldn't have been there before, that's a new change. Sorry, I should have said that before - rst20xx (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I like the animal genus/subfamily topics, they fit so well in the "tree" structure of a Ftopic or Gtopic. --PresN 15:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - can you create a book on this topic? Just click on the link in the top left of the topic box and create a book there, copying the formatting used in other existing books - rst20xx (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo Metro rolling stock

[edit]

I am nominating Oslo Metro rolling stock for GT because I feel it meets the criteria. The system has had three types of rolling stock, and the articles on these have all reached GA, along with an overview article. Arsenikk (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • All four articles are built around a 'history' and a 'specifications' section. For the main article, I included the history article as a {{main}} to show readers that the full history is available in another article. The rolling stock article is of course only related to the history of the rolling stock, and makes up perhaps a tenth or less of the scope of the main history article. Arsenikk (talk) 16:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neverwinter Nights 2

[edit]
Major contributors: Vantine84, Drilnoth, WP D&D

Nergaal (talk) 02:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]