Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:United States Air Force
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The portal was promoted by Cirt 17:45, 23 October 2009 [1].
I'd like to get the Air Force Portal to featured portal status. It was peer reviewed from 27 July-4 September and only received minor comments. I'd appreciate any help that reviewers could offer to help me improve the page.--Ndunruh (talk) 07:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Query: Did you notify talk pages of relevant WikiProjects? Cirt (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Negative, I didn't see that in the nomination instructions. I will notify them now, thanks for the head's up.--Ndunruh (talk) 14:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This portal looks great. Every other portal I've visited seems way too busy. Too much stuff on the main portal page to the point where it's almost overwhelming. You don't know where to start. I like how streamlined this portal is. Sometimes less is more. I especially like how the featured articles are right at the top. I don't have any suggestions. Perhaps I didn't read closely enough but it meets the criteria for featured status from what I can tell. // Gbern3 (talk) 18:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the input!--Ndunruh (talk) 23:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Jh12 (talk) (addressed) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Support - I believe Portal:United States Air Force demonstrates the content, quality, and polish of a featured portal. --Jh12 (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - After a thorough review of this portal and the criteria, I believe that all of the points have been fulfilled and that the portal is of the quality that is acceptable for a featured portal. -MBK004 20:45, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.