Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Comedy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The portal was promoted 16:09, 4 February 2008.
Self-nomination. See archived peer review. Stats: (28) Selected articles, all of WP:FA quality, (20) Selected biographies, all of WP:FA or WP:GA quality, (20) Selected pictures, all are free-use images, (20) Selected quotes, all with free-use images and links to notable individuals with articles on Wikipedia, (44) Did you know entries, showing 5 at a time. All of the above sections are randomized and display new content when the portal is purged. The News section updates automatically from Wikinews, using User:Wikinews Importer Bot. I believe the portal meets the standards for Featured Portal status. Cirt (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Support: As some who has also worked on this and a member of the Comedy WikiProject, I believe that this portal covers all the FP criteria and is of a high enough standard to become featured. ISD (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Definitely featured status. [sd] 20:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It is really an amazing portal. There are couple of small concerns, can't it have listing of Requested articles in Things you can do? Secondly, isn't it better way to use category, rather search option for Wikinews in Associated wikimedia? - Shyam (T/C) 13:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Good points. And - done and done. Cirt (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Better than some featured ones. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 20:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Closed as successful by Rudget (talk · contribs) at 16:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC) - All points corrected, 3 supports, over 2 weeks, no opposes.[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.